Abstract:The new ways of organising work and offering services on the market through the so-called digital platforms seem to have put the traditional legal standards for classifying employment relationships into question. The mechanism of functioning of digital platforms, in fact, seems to put together a series of ‘old’ problems in a new combination. On the one hand, platforms present themselves on the market as subjects with an apparently rarefied organisational structure, moving along the threads of algorithms; on the other hand, those who collaborate with them seem to do so in a spontaneous, voluntary, random and flexible way. The radical fragmentation, or reduction to the minimum, of the productive organisation, is accompanied by the fragmentation of the work activity itself, made by an anonymous multitude of people (‘crowd’), who move together in the light of invisible dynamics, dictated by unknown algorithms.Academic scholarship - and in some countries also case law - has already offered many and different answers to the problem of the legal classification of the relationship of those who work for/with the platforms. They vary according to the methodological approaches and the systems used as a reference.The present paper argues that it is not possible to provide for a general answer to such question, valid for every concrete case. In fact, the specific features of each relationship between the platform and the workers might largely vary from case to case.However, some elements that are functional to the solution of the classification issue are still disputable and shall be clarified: (a) in most of the cases, the platform does not act as a mere intermediary between the supply and demand for a certain service; instead, it represents the direct supplier of that service, which is provided through the activities of the workers; therefore, the workers are fully integrated into the platforms’ organisation; (b) in the light of the rating mechanism and the adoption of certain contractual clauses on withdrawal – that will be described –, often the worker is made illegitimately liable for the unfulfilment of the obligations to the customer; (c) when the conditions a) and b) occur, a substantial overlap between the business carried out by digital platforms and the workers’ activities can be detected and this shall be taken into consideration in the investigation on the legal status of the workers, especially in order to prevent any attempt to circumvent the application of the employment law protections.

Emerging Platform Work in the Context of the Regulatory Loophole (The Uber Fiasco in Hungary)

Labor Platforms and Gig Work: The Failure to Regulate

The regulatory challenge of occupational safety and health in the online platform economy

Constitutional Values in the Gig-Economy? Why Labor Law Fails at Platform Work, and What Can We Do about It?

Dependence and precarity in the platform economy

Towards ‘bogus employment?’ The contradictory outcomes of ride-hailing regulation in Berlin, Lisbon and Paris

In search of an adequate European policy response to the platform economy

Trade Union Strategies towards Platform Workers: Exploration Instead of Action (The Case of Hungarian Trade Unions)

Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States

A “Circuits of Power”-based Perspective on Algorithmic Management and Labour in the Gig Economy

What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy

Digitalisation and work: challenges from the platform-economy

The Uberisation of work: the challenge of regulating platform capitalism. A commentary

Digital Platforms, Gig Economy, Precarious Employment, and the Invisible Hand of Social Class

The politics of Uber: Infrastructural power in the United States and Europe

Ride-Hailing Platforms in Brazil: Regulatory Challenges in Times of Crisis

Taming Proteus: Challenges for Risk Regulation of Powerful Digital Labor Platforms

Platformic Management, Boundary Resources for Gig Work, and Worker Autonomy

Varieties of platform unionism: a view from the Global South on workers’ power in the digital economy

Globalization, platform work, and wellbeing—a comparative study of Uber drivers in three cities: London, Helsinki, and St Petersburg