Abstract:Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (INA) created an immigration system favoring the immigration of spouses, children, and parents of US citizens, thereby establishing family unity as the cornerstone of US immigration policy. Despite this historical emphasis on family unity, backlogs and limited visas for non-immediate relatives of US citizens and legal permanent residents, the militarization of the US-Mexico border, punitive measures for those who enter without inspection, such as the forced separation of children from their parents at the US border, and an aggressive policy of deportation have made it more difficult for members of Mexican binational families to unify. How do members of Mexican binational families manage the hardships that result from US immigration policies that prolong and force family separation? Immigrants and return migrants alike may not be aware of their rights and the legal remedies that exist to enforce them. Structural barriers such as poverty, legal status, fear of deportation, lack of proficiency in English, and lack of familiarity with government bureaucracies no doubt prevent many migrants in the United States and return migrants in Mexico from coming forward to request legal assistance and relief in the courts. Despite these barriers, when it comes to family matters, members of some Mexican binational families can and do assert their rights. In this article, we analyze an administrative database of the Department of Legal Protection of the Mexican consular network that documents migrant legal claims resulting from family separation, along with findings from 21 interviews with consular staff and community organizations in three consular jurisdictions - El Paso, Raleigh, and San Francisco - to investigate the sociolegal processes of claims. Our investigation centers on the mediating role the Mexican state - via its consular network - has developed to assist binational families as they attempt to assert their rights and resolve child support and child custody problems resulting from prolonged and forced family separation. We find that the resolution of binational family claims in part depends on the institutional infrastructure that has developed at local, state, and federal levels, along with the commitment and capacity of the receiving and sending states and the binational structures they establish. These binational structures transcend the limitations of national legal systems to achieve and implement family rights and obligations across borders.

Experiences of Undocumented Parents Reuniting with Children Who Entered the United States as Unaccompanied Minors

Parent-child border separation and the road to repair: addressing a global refugee phenomenon

Unaccompanied Children in the Office of Refugee Resettlement Care

A critical examination of policies and practices impacting the education of unaccompanied immigrant children in the United States

Changing the Way Nonprofits Prepare: Lessons Learned from Early Resettlement of Rohingya Unaccompanied Refugee Minors

Unaccompanied Children at the United States Border, a Human Rights Crisis that can be Addressed with Policy Change

Health Risks of Unaccompanied Immigrant Children in Federal Custody and in US Communities

Between the lines: A mixed-methods study on the impacts of parental deportation on the health and well-being of U.S. citizen children

The psychobiological consequences of child separation at the border: lessons from research on attachment and emotion regulation

Family Matters: Claiming Rights across the US-Mexico Migratory System

Educational Services for Unaccompanied Immigrant Children in the United States

Latino Parents’ Perspectives on the Life Trajectories of Mixed-Status Children

The uneven geography of asylum and humanitarian relief: place-based precarity for Central American migrant youth in the United States judicial system

Trauma in the American asylum process: Experiences of immigrant families under the migrant protection protocols.

All in the (Definition of) Family: Transnational Parent–Child Relationships, Rights to Family Life, and Canadian Immigration Law

Emotional Wellbeing of Asylum-Seeking Children After Release From Immigration Detention

The Development of a Mental Health Program for Unaccompanied Minors in the United States

Mental health of unaccompanied children: effects of U.S. immigration policies

Adolescents de facto deported in Oaxaca, Mexico: Mental and emotional health impacts

Impact of punitive immigration policies, parent-child separation and child detention on the mental health and development of children

Remember these are children: unaccompanied migrant children in detention