Mastery of "Monthly Effects": Big Data Insights into Contrarian Strategies for DJI 30 and NDX 100 Stocks over a Two-Decade Period

Chien-Liang Chiu,Paoyu Huang,Min-Yuh Day,Yensen Ni,Yuhsin Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math12020356
IF: 2.4
2024-01-23
Mathematics
Abstract:In contrast to finding better monthly performance shown in a specific month, such as the January effect (i.e., better stock price performance in January as opposed to other months), which has been extensively studied, the goal of this study is to determine whether investors would obtain better subsequent performance as technical trading signals emitted in a specific month because, from the investment perspective, investors purchasing stocks now would not know their performance until later. We contend that our analysis emphasizes its critical role in steering investment decisions and enhancing profitability; nonetheless, this issue appears to be overlooked in the relevant literature. As such, utilizing big data to analyze the constituent stocks of the DJI 30 and NDX 100 indices from 2003 to 2022 (i.e., two-decade data), this study investigates whether trading these stocks as trading signals emitted via contrarian regulation of stochastic oscillator indicators (SOIs) and the relative strength index (RSI) in specific months would result in superior subsequent performance (hereafter referred to as "monthly effects"). This study discovers that the oversold signals generated by these two contrarian regulations in March were associated with higher subsequent performance for holding 100 to 250 trading days (roughly one year) than other months. These findings highlight the importance of the trading time and the superiority of the RSI over SOIs in generating profits. This study sheds light on the significance of oversold trading signals and suggests that the "monthly effect" is crucial for achieving higher returns.
mathematics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to explore whether stock trading based on technical trading signals during specific months can lead to better subsequent performance, a phenomenon known as the "Monthly Effect." Unlike the widely studied "January Effect" (where stock prices in January typically outperform other months), this study focuses on whether investors purchasing stocks when technical trading signals are triggered in specific months will achieve higher returns in the future. Specifically, the research employed big data analysis methods to examine the data of the constituents of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI 30) and the NASDAQ 100 Index (NDX 100) from 2003 to 2022. Researchers paid particular attention to the oversold signals under two contrarian investment strategies: the Stochastic Oscillator Indicators (SOIs) and the Relative Strength Index (RSI). They found that the oversold signals generated in March, whether under the contrarian rules of SOIs or RSI, led to better stock performance after holding for 100 to 250 trading days (approximately one year) compared to other months. This indicates that choosing the right trading timing is crucial for enhancing returns, and RSI outperforms SOIs in generating profits. Moreover, the paper discusses market efficiency theory, technical trading rules, and momentum and contrarian investment strategies. It points out that despite the general belief in market efficiency, many exchanges do not fully adhere to the Efficient Market Hypothesis. By conducting technical analysis and exploiting market anomalies, such as the "Monthly Effect," investors can capture irrational behaviors in the market, thereby achieving excess returns. Finally, the study emphasizes the impact of investor sentiment and market anomalies on the "Monthly Effect" and its significance in challenging the stock market efficiency theory. In summary, this research fills a gap in the existing literature regarding the subsequent performance of technical trading signals in specific months, offering investors a new perspective to optimize investment decisions by utilizing the "Monthly Effect."