Plasma antioxidant potential measured by total radical trapping antioxidant parameter in a cohort of multiple sclerosis patients

Marge Kartau,Joonas Kartau,Marjatta Pohja,Auli Verkkoniemi‐Ahola
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3377
IF: 3.1
2024-01-19
Brain and Behavior
Abstract:This study evaluates multiple sclerosis (MS) patients' plasma antioxidant potential using the total radical trapping parameter (TRAP) assay. Our findings suggest that lower plasma antioxidant potential is associated with higher disability and active MS immunopathology. MS patients' plasma TRAP does not reflect the total antioxidant defense of the body, and when used as a single plasma biomarker, TRAP is not a reliable marker of oxidative stress in MS disease. Background Oxidative injury has been implicated as a mediator of demyelination, axonal damage, and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). There is a high demand for oxidative injury biomarkers. The aim of the study was to evaluate MS patients' plasma antioxidant potential using the total radical trapping parameter (TRAP) assay and examine its usefulness as an MS disease biomarker. Methods A total number of 112 MS patients underwent an analysis of TRAP. In addition, plasma uric acid (UA) levels were analyzed. The neurological and radiological data were collected from patient records from Helsinki University Hospital during 2012–2013 when first‐line injectables of moderate‐efficacy, natalizumab (NTZ), and fingolimod (FTY) of high efficacy disease modifying therapies and in some cases azathioprine (AZT) were used to treat MS. Results TRAP values were negatively associated with expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score with p‐value .052, β = −28. There was also a negative association in TRAP values between patients with no medication (n = 22, TRAP mean 1255 μmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI] 1136–1374)) and patients who received NTZ, p‐value .020 (n = 19, TRAP mean was 991 μmol/L (95% CI 849–1133) or FTY treatment, p‐value .030 (n = 5, TRAP mean 982 μmol/L (95% CI 55–1909). Due to a small sample size, these results were not significant after applying a false discovery rate correction at a 0.05 significance level but are worth highlighting. Men in the study had higher TRAP values, p‐value = .001 (TRAP mean 1320 ± 293 μmol/L) than women (TRAP mean 1082 ± 288 μmol/L). UA was positively associated with TRAP values, p‐value
behavioral sciences,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?