Engineering for Whom? Investigating How Engineering Students Develop and Apply Technoskeptical Thinking

Jacob Pleasants

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2024.2333242

2024-03-29

Engineering Studies

Abstract:College engineering education prioritizes technical knowledge and skills, but there is growing recognition that it must also address the social and societal implications of engineering work. Beyond professional ethics, engineers need to develop broader understandings of how engineering and technology interact with and impact individuals and communities. This study focuses on the development of engineering students' 'technoskeptical' ways of thinking, defined as their ability to think about technologies as more than neutral tools and analyze their complex interactions with sociotechnical systems and values. Students in the study were incoming first-year engineering students who participated in a four-week summer bridge program. The program included a course called 'engineering design for humans and the environment,' which foregrounded sociotechnical issues and was designed to promote technoskeptical thinking. To assess students' uptake of technoskepticism, they completed a pre and post task on which they analyzed the unintended effects of outdoor street lighting. Although students engaged in similar technoskeptical inquiries during the design course, this study found that students tended not to transfer those emergent skills to the street lighting task. The results indicate a need to expand instructional efforts so that students more fully internalize technoskeptical practices and apply them to novel situations.

engineering, multidisciplinary,education, scientific disciplines,history & philosophy of science