Abstract:Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent and debilitating condition. While numerous treatment options are available, low treatment response and high remission rates remain common, leading to the concept of treatment-resistant depression (TRD): a classification applied to patients who fail multiple courses of therapy. A patient with TRD can only be identified after repeated, and often prolonged, therapeutic efforts. Objective: To use data readily available to integrated delivery networks to identify characteristics predictive of TRD among patients initiating pharmacotherapy for MDD. Methods: Decision Resources Group Real-World Data, an integrated medical/pharmacy claims and electronic health record dataset, was used to conduct a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients with MDD who initiated antidepressant treatment between July 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015. Individuals were followed for 24 months to determine treatment resistance. Eligible individuals had integrated claims and electronic health record data available, completed at least 1 course of therapy of adequate dose and duration to achieve response, and had 30 months of continuous benefits eligibility (6 months before and 24 months after treatment initiation). Stepwise logistic regression and demographic, health history, health care utilization, medication, provider, and related characteristics were used to predict onset of TRD. Results: 35,246 people met eligibility and 7,098 (20.1%) met TRD criteria after an average of 402 days. Significant predictors of TRD included patient age, diagnosis of insomnia and hypertension, psychiatric office visits, nurse telephonic encounters, anticonvulsant medication use, suicidality, physician specialty associated with index prescription, total prescription drug claims, unique antidepressants attempted, and duration of untreated illness (the lag between diagnosis and index prescription). The final model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.83. Structured patient-generated health data, specifically, the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were only reported for 542 patients (1.5%). Conclusions: TRD transition occurs after a prolonged treatment period, suggesting clinical inertia. Using data routinely available to integrated delivery networks and accountable care organizations, it is feasible to identify patients likely to qualify as treatment resistant. Monitoring risk factors may allow health systems to identify patients at risk for TRD earlier, potentially improving outcomes. Early identification of this at-risk population can allow for targeted resources for earlier intervention, more aggressive follow-up, and alternative treatment options. Furthermore, this model can be used to estimate future demand for specialized care resources, such as those delivered by mood disorder clinics. Disclosures: This project was sponsored by Janssen Scientific Affairs. Pesa, Chow, and Verbanac are employed by Janssen Scientific Affairs and report stock ownership in Johnson & Johnson. Liberman, Davis, Heverly-Fitt, and Ruetsch are employed by Health Analytics, which received funding from Janssen Scientific Affairs for work on this project. This study was presented as a poster at the U.S. Psych Congress; October 3-6, 2019; San Diego, CA.

The complexity of treatment-resistant depression: A data-driven approach

Treatment‐resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions

Observational study to characterize treatment-resistant depression in Germany, France and the United Kingdom: analysis of real-world data collected through a survey of healthcare professionals

Treatment-Resistant Depression in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Systematic Literature Review of Data from 2012 to 2022

Apparent Lack of Benefit of Combining Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavior Therapy for the Treatment of Resistant Depression: Patient-Centered Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial

How different definition criteria may predict clinical outcome in Treatment Resistant Depression: results from a prospective real-world study

Defining treatment‐resistant depression

Overview of treatment-resistant depression

Treatment‐resistant major depressive disorder: Canadian expert consensus on definition and assessment

Clinical and Biological Factors Are Associated with Treatment-Resistant Depression

A Delphi-method-based consensus guideline for definition of treatment-resistant depression for clinical trials

Diagnosis and definition of treatment-resistant depression

Treatment resistant depression: methodological overview and operational criteria

Treatment resistant depression: A comparative study of access, pathways, and outcomes between Caucasian and ethnic minority individuals

Care pathways, prescribing practices and treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant depression: retrospective, population-based cohort study

[How to define treatment-resistant depression?]

Predicting Incident Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Model Designed for Health Systems of Care

Incidence of treatment-resistant depression during the first mood depressive episode

Comorbidity and healthcare utilization in patients with treatment resistant depression: A large-scale retrospective cohort analysis using electronic health records

Definition of treatment-resistant depression - Asia Pacific perspectives

Treatment-resistant depression and its diagnosis and treatment