A head-to-head comparison of plasma biomarkers to detect biologically defined Alzheimer in a memory clinic
Federica Anastasi,Aida Fernández-Lebrero,Nicholas J Ashton,Paula Ortiz-Romero,Javier Torres-Torronteras,Armand González-Escalante,Marta Milà-Alomà,José Contador,Greta Garcia-Escobar,Rosa Maria Manero-Borràs,Irene Navalpotro-Gómez,Aparna Sahajan,Qinyu Hao,Bingqing Zhang,Andreas Jeromin,Nathalie Le Bastard,Alicia Nadal,Tahmine Mousavi,Gwendlyn Kollmorgen,Margherita Carboni,Oriol Grau-Rivera,Henrik Zetterberg,Marta del Campo,Kaj Blennow,Albert Puig-Pijoan,Marc Suárez-Calvet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.26.24316176
2024-10-27
Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been widely studied, but direct comparisons of several biomarkers in clinical settings remain limited.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, plasma biomarkers from 197 participants in the BIODEGMAR cohort at Hospital del Mar (Barcelona) were analysed. Participants were classified based on AD cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) core biomarkers. We assessed the ability of plasma p-tau181, p-tau217, p-tau231, t-tau, and Aβ42/40 to classify Aβ status.
RESULTS: Plasma p-tau biomarkers had a greater diagnostic performance and larger effect sizes compared to t-tau and Aβ42/40 assays in detecting biologically defined AD. Among them, plasma p-tau217 consistently outperformed the others, demonstrating superior AUC. Furthermore, p-tau217 showed the strongest correlation between plasma and CSF levels, underscoring its potential as a reliable surrogate for CSF biomarkers.
DISCUSSION: Several plasma biomarkers, targeting different epitopes and using different platforms, demonstrated high performance in distinguishing biologically defined AD in a memory clinic setting.
Neurology