Intradermal Inoculation of Inactivated Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccine Induced Effective Immune Responses Comparable to Conventional Intramuscular Injection in Pigs

Simin Lee,Sameer ul Salam Mattoo,Chang-Gi Jeong,Seung-Chai Kim,Salik Nazki,Gyehan Lee,Yong-Soo Park,Sun Young Park,Myeon-Sik Yang,Bumseok Kim,Sang-Myeong Lee,Won-Il Kim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12020190
2024-02-13
Vaccines
Abstract:All pigs in the Republic of Korea are given the foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) vaccine intramuscularly (IM) as part of the country's vaccination policy. However, the IM administration of the FMDV vaccine to pig results in residual vaccine components in the muscle and undesirable changes in muscle and soft tissues, causing economic losses in swine production. In this study, we evaluated whether intradermal (ID) vaccination could be proposed as an alternative to IM administration. ID vaccination (0.2 mL on each side of the neck muscle) and IM vaccination (2 mL on each side of the neck muscle) were performed twice, separated by 14 days, using a commercial FMD vaccine in specific-pathogen-free pigs. We observed growth performance, gross and microscopic lesions at the inoculation site, FMDV-specific antibodies, and neutralizing antibodies for 35 days after vaccination. Side effects on the skin grossly appeared following ID administration, but most were reduced within two weeks. All ID-vaccinated pigs showed inflammatory lesions limited to the dermis, but IM-vaccinated pigs had abnormal undesirable changes and pus in the muscle. ID-vaccinated pigs performed comparably to IM-vaccinated pigs in terms of growth, FMD virus-specific antibodies, protection capability against FMDV, and T-cell induction. This study demonstrated that the ID inoculation of the inactivated FMD vaccine induced immune responses comparable to an IM injection at 1/10 of the inoculation dose and that the inoculation lesion was limited to the dermis, effectively protecting against the formation of abnormal undesirable changes in muscle and soft tissues.
immunology,medicine, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Aims to Address This paper aims to evaluate whether the intradermal (ID) injection method can serve as an alternative to the traditional intramuscular (IM) injection method for administering foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) vaccines in pigs. Specifically, the study focuses on the following points: 1. **Reducing Side Effects**: Traditional intramuscular injections can lead to vaccine components remaining in the muscle, causing adverse changes in muscle and soft tissue, which result in economic losses. The study aims to reduce these adverse effects through the intradermal injection method. 2. **Comparison of Immune Responses**: Evaluating the effectiveness of intradermal versus intramuscular injections in terms of immune response, including specific antibodies, neutralizing antibodies, and protection against FMDV. Through experiments, researchers found that the immune effect of intradermal injections is comparable to that of intramuscular injections, but the adverse reactions at the injection site are mainly confined to the dermis layer of the skin and do not affect the muscle layer. This indicates that intradermal injection is a feasible and effective alternative method that can maintain good immune effects while reducing adverse impacts.