Intergenerational Narratives: A Pilot Elective Course Connecting Preclinical Medical Students and Community Members in Senior Living

Heidi Banh,Anastasia Ryhanych,Desiree Shapiro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2024.01.142

IF: 7.996

2024-02-21

American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract:Introduction Intergenerational programs have been shown to be beneficial for both younger and older generations. Through empathy-building activities like storytelling, medical students can learn compassionate communication skills while forming positive attitudes towards older adults. Such programs can instill values to celebrate and honor the diverse and increasingly-aging communities we live in and will one day provide care for. Despite compelling evidence supporting intergenerational programming, including reducing ageism and promoting empathy and resilience, the UC San Diego School of Medicine lacked opportunities to engage with older adults in non-clinical settings and learn about the holistic geriatric experience through specific empathy-building activities. To bridge this gap and need, we designed an 8-week program titled "Intergenerational Narratives: Building Empathy for Older Adults Through Storytelling." Medical students were paired with a resident in a local senior living community, who they interviewed for their life's experiences and stories. There were also group discussions to create community, with topics ranging from sharing backgrounds, compassionate care, and positive psychological traits. We measured the program's potential impacts on medical students' and older adults' empathy, compassion, social connectedness, resilience, mental well-being, and wisdom. We are assessing the feasibility and sustainability of the program at UCSD SOM, and are exploring implementation and dissemination strategies. Methods We used a mixed-method, repeated-measures design to analyze these effects. In addition to pre- and post-program surveys for both cohorts, we will also assess long-term effects on students by administering a follow-up assessment before graduation. A comparison group for medical students was recruited and assessed at the respective time points to control for confounding factors. Standardized survey measures included: 1) Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale (IOS), where "other" is defined as one's community (Aron et al., 1992).2) Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) (Spreng et al., 2009). 3) Compassion Scale (Pommier et al., 2020). 4) Jeste-Thomas Wisdom Index (Thomas et al., 2019).5) Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) (Smith et al., 2008).6) Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF) (Keyes, 2009). Qualtrics surveys responses with raw entries were extracted in excel files.​ Custom scripts written in MATLAB were used to calculate the scores on administered surveys for each of the 3 groups​. Since the data in all survey measures were non-normally distributed, Wilcoxon Sign-Rank test was used to compare pre and post scores of each group.​ For thematic data, results are presented using Raincloud plot to demonstrate the changes in response patter from pre to post session. Results The older adult intervention group showed significant improvement on their wisdom measure only (p = 0.023).​ The medical student control group did not show any changes on any survey scales from pre to post session.​The medical student intervention group benefited most from the program, showing robust improvement in their compassion and connectedness with their community (p < 0.01). ​The intervention group also showed a significant increase in their empathy score (p=0.023). Among the original questions, thematically there was a significant increase in feeling more listened to, respected, and valued when interacting with individuals from different generations (p=0.002). Qualitatively, students valued dedicated time in the curriculum to connect with peers and community members in a non-clinical setting. They appreciated stories and interviewing as methods to practice empathy and compassion building skills. They welcomed the opportunity to actively reflect on their unconscious biases. There was a desire to learn more about common age-related challenges and health disparities. They felt more connected to their reasons for going into medicine. Thematic analysis of older adult feedback revealed finding it refreshing connecting with the younger generation, especially through the one-on-one sessions. They appreciated that medical students wanted to hear their stories and experiences. Constructive feedback included desiring more organizational overview and greater clarity of the program's purpose, aims, and expectations. Beyond sharing their life stories, they desired discussing their personal health challenges, aging experiences, healthcare experiences, and end-of-life issues. Conclusions Despite having small sample sizes in each group, the pilot data indicate the sensitivity and benefits of the intervention program for both older adults and med -Abstract Truncated-

psychiatry,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology