Bulk and Surface Characterization of Distinct Hematite Morphology: Implications for Wettability and Flotation Response

Lívia Marques Faustino,Belinda McFadzean,José Tadeu Gouvêa Junior,Laurindo de Salles Leal Filho
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/min14060609
IF: 2.5
2024-06-15
Minerals
Abstract:To understand why hematite of different genesis behave diversely in flotation systems, this study assesses the flotation response at pH 5 of bulk (morphology, texture, Crystal Preferential Orientation (CPO)) plus interfacial (surface area, zeta potential, immersion enthalpy, contact angle, induction time) characteristics of species formed under distinct metamorphic conditions: low-strain deformation (Hematite-1) versus high-strain deformation (Hematite-2). Hematite-2 (predominantly composed of specular and lamellar morphologies) shows (001) CPO and exhibits fewer Fe sites on its surface that undergo doubly coordinated Fe-OH when exposed to moisture. This results in a less reactive surface associated with a less ordered adsorbed water layer than Hematite-1, which is predominantly composed of granular and sinuous hematite. Those characteristics lead to a naturally hydrophobic behavior characterized by the exothermic energy below the Critical Immersion Enthalpy (−∆Himm < 200 mJ/m2), lower values of zeta potential due to attenuated dissociation of Fe-OH(surf), lower induction time (47 ms vs. 128 ms), higher contact angle (39° vs. 13°), and higher flotation recovery (21% vs. 12%) than Hematite-1.
geochemistry & geophysics,mineralogy,mining & mineral processing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?