The Geography of Nostalgia. Global and Local Perspectives on Modernity and Loss

J. Connell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/GERE.12232

2016-11-01

Abstract:It is an ambitious author who entitles a book The Geography of Nostalgia and then publishes it in a series on Advances in Sociology. Will those pesky sociologists ever take space and place properly on board and how, in less than 180 pages, can this be the definitive text? It was timely. The book landed on my desk a day or so after I had come back from an Elvis Presley festival in rural Australia—nostalgia and weary dance moves a plenty. Back home I changed into my retro tee shirt, that no one else seemed to love, hastily grabbed some black pudding, not quite a palaeo diet but a homely reminder, and settled down for real cricket on TV—not the Twenty20 that reminded me of my own slogging days in Yorkshire paddocks – but John Major’s village greens, and warm beer. It was either that, Downton Abbey or Who Do You Think You Are? Meanwhile the news bulletins focused on EU states contemplating a return to pre-Schengen days, alongside BREXIT, while Donald Trump and Islamic State, in marginally different way, were seeking other variants of nostalgia and the reclamation of the nation-state. Scottish nationalists were still glowing in the aftermath of the last election and Catalonia was seeking a similar strategy. Now I would discover what it was that might tie together all these threads of nostalgia. Unfortunately I did not: barely a word on food, music, sport, genealogy, those many things that make up our senses of place and space, and time. Unfair of course to target any book review at what is not in a book, and Bonnett does briefly encounter coffee, migrants, and cheese. What then does he discuss? Despite the omissions the book is still in many ways eclectic, indeed wantonly so. It wanders from English fields to Indian cremations, from Latour, Marx, and Nietzsche, to Yi Fu Tuan, Proust, and Thomas Hardy. But bringing all that together is no easy task. Bonnett is seeking to explore the interconnected nature of modernity, geography and nostalgia, no trivial task. He presents nostalgia as a “disruptive and unsettling force” rather than, he argues, as in various attempts to “rescue nostalgia for progressive politics” that he confronts. Bonnett thus faced an unusually difficult challenge—to write an unsentimental account of a topic that is inherently sentimental, and which veers from intense personal nostalgia to national processes of memorialisation. The soft nostalgia of much of the opening paragraph is quite inadmissible here; nothing is without political overtones. The Geography of Nostalgia is heralded as ‘the first study of loss as a global and local phenomenon, something that occurs on many different scales and which connects many different people’. True enough, but it is not the first.

Sociology,Geography