Utilizing epigenetics to study the shared nature of development and biological aging across the lifespan

Laurel Raffington
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00239-5
2024-03-22
npj Science of Learning
Abstract:Recently, biological aging has been quantified in DNA-methylation samples of older adults and applied as so-called "methylation profile scores" (MPSs) in separate target samples, including samples of children. This nascent research indicates that (1) biological aging can be quantified early in the life course, decades before the onset of aging-related disease, (2) is affected by common environmental predictors of childhood development, and (3) shows overlap with "developmental processes" (e.g., puberty). Because the MPSs were computed using algorithms developed in adults, these studies indicate a molecular link between childhood environments, development, and adult biological aging. Yet, if MPSs can be used to connect development and aging, previous research has only traveled one way, deriving MPSs developed in adults and applying them to samples of children. Researchers have not yet quantified epigenetic measures that reflect the pace of child development, and tested whether resulting MPSs are associated with physical and psychological aging. In this perspective I posit that combining measures of biological aging with new quantifications of child development has the power to address fundamental questions about life span: How are development and experience in childhood related to biological aging in adulthood? And what is aging?
psychology, experimental,education & educational research,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore how epigenetics can be used to study the relationship between development and biological aging throughout the entire lifecycle from birth to adulthood. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Biological Aging in Early Life Processes**: Research has found that biological aging can be quantified in the early stages of life (such as childhood), which is decades before the onset of related diseases. 2. **Impact of Environmental Factors**: Common environmental predictors (such as childhood developmental environment) have a significant impact on biological aging. 3. **Overlap of Developmental Processes**: There is an overlap between biological aging and developmental processes (such as puberty). ### Background and Motivation Traditionally, aging has been primarily studied by gerontologists, while development has been mainly studied by child development specialists. However, longitudinal birth cohort studies have shown that there is a link between childhood environment and development and aging in later life. These findings have prompted scientists to explore how childhood experiences and later life outcomes are maintained over the decades of life. ### Main Points 1. **Molecular Bridge**: DNA methylation (DNAm) measurements can serve as a molecular bridge connecting development and aging. Current research mainly applies methylation profile scores (MPSs) developed for adults to child samples, but has not yet attempted to develop algorithms that reflect the development of children and adolescents, and test whether these methylation profiles are related to physiological and psychological aging in adults. 2. **Environment and Biological Aging**: Social determinants such as socioeconomic disadvantage, racial and ethnic marginalization may shorten healthy lifespan by accelerating biological aging. Studies have found that these social factors not only affect accelerated biological age but also the rate of aging. 3. **Overlap of Developmental Processes**: Early life adversity not only accelerates biological aging but also accelerates developmental processes, such as earlier onset of puberty, sexual maturation, and rapid brain development. These accelerated developmental processes are considered adaptive within an evolutionary framework, as they may increase the likelihood of early reproduction in threatening or impoverished environments. ### Future Directions The authors propose that combining the assessment of biological aging with new methods of quantifying child development can explore fundamental questions in the human lifecycle, such as the link between childhood experiences and development and adult biological aging, and what the nature of aging is. ### Conclusion This paper emphasizes the importance of studying biological aging in early life processes and proposes future research directions, including developing new algorithms that reflect child development and testing the relationship between these algorithms and adult aging. Through these studies, we can better understand how childhood experiences affect health and the aging process throughout the lifecycle.