An international multicenter study comparing COVID‐19 omicron outcomes in patients with hematological malignancies treated with obinutuzumab versus rituximab

Tali Shafat,Daniel Grupel,Tzvika Porges,Ran Abuhasira,Ana Belkin,Ofir Deri,Yonatan Oster,Shadi Zahran,Ehud Horwitz,Netanel A. Horowitz,Hazim Khatib,Marjorie Vieira Batista,Anita Cassoli Cortez,Tal Brosh‐Nissimov,Yafit Segman,Linor Ishay,Regev Cohen,Alaa Atamna,Amy Spallone,Roy F. Chemaly,Juan Carlos Ramos‐Ramos,Michal Chowers,Evgeny Rogozin,Noga Carmi Oren,Şiran Keske,Orit Wolfovitz Barchad,Lior Nesher,the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Study Group for Respiratory Viruses,the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Respiratory Viruses (ESGREV)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6997
IF: 4.711
2024-02-25
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:An international multicancer study of 1048 hematological cancer patients, shows those on obinutuzumab faced higher risks of severe omicron COVID‐19 outcomes than those on rituximab, despite being younger and with fewer comorbidities. Objectives Hematological malignancy (HM) patients treated with anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibodies are at higher risk for severe COVID‐19. A previous single‐center study showed worse outcomes in patients treated with obinutuzumab compared to rituximab. We examined this hypothesis in a large international multicenter cohort. Methods We included HM patients from 15 centers, from five countries treated with anti‐CD20, comparing those treated with obinutuzumab (O‐G) to rituximab (R‐G) between December 2021 and June 2022, when Omicron lineage was dominant. Results We collected data on 1048 patients. Within the R‐G (n = 762, 73%), 191 (25%) contracted COVID‐19 compared to 103 (36%) in the O‐G. COVID‐19 patients in the O‐G were younger (61 ± 11.7 vs. 64 ± 14.5, p = 0.039), had more indolent HM diagnosis (aggressive lymphoma: 3.9% vs. 67.0%, p
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?