Comparative Effectiveness of Anti-Hyperlipidemic Drugs Monotherapy in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Xuechun Li,Dennis Steenhuis,Maarten Bijlsma,Stijn de Vos,Sumaira Mubarik,Jens Bos,Catharina Schuiling-Veninga,Eelko Hak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s479120
IF: 2.145
2024-10-27
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Xuechun Li, 1 Dennis Steenhuis, 1 Maarten J Bijlsma, 1, 2 Stijn de Vos, 1 Sumaira Mubarik, 1 Jens HJ Bos, 1 Catharina CM Schuiling-Veninga, 1 Eelko Hak 1 1 Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; 2 Laboratory of Population Health, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany Correspondence: Xuechun Li, PhD Research Fellow, Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen, the Netherlands, Tel +31 649019602, Email Purpose: Anti-hyperlipidemic drug treatments are effective in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease. In a long-term retrospective inception cohort study, we aimed to assess the real-world comparative effectiveness of anti-hyperlipidemic monotherapies for primary prevention of cardiovascular events. Patients and Methods: Patients aged 18 years and older, who initiated primary prevention with anti-hyperlipidemic monotherapy, were selected from the University of Groningen IADB.nl dispensing database. In intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis we included all patients, whereas in per-protocol (PP) analysis we included both all patients independent of adherence (PPIA) and adherent patients (PPA). Study outcome was the time to first prescription of acute cardiac drug therapy measured by valid drug proxies to identify a first major cardiovascular event. We applied inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW) analysis using Cox regression and time-varying Cox regression with simvastatin as the reference category to estimate the average treatment effect hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Atorvastatin users had significantly higher hazards compared to simvastatin users (HR range: 1.27 to 1.47, 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.69). Similarly, Pravastatin users also exhibited increased hazards compared to simvastatin users (HR range: 1.41 to 1.56, 95% CI: 1.14 to 2.04). Similar patterns were observed in patients with diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and asthma/COPD. No differences were found in the hazards of rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, fibrates, and simvastatin. Conclusion: Atorvastatin and pravastatin users had higher long-term rates of cardiovascular events compared to simvastatin monotherapy in primary prevention, the difference may be attributed to the confounding by severity, but also possibly due to differences in drug mechanisms or patient response. These findings could influence current guideline recommendations, suggesting a potential preference for simvastatin in primary prevention, underscoring the need for further research to explore long-term impacts and underlying mechanisms, especially in diverse populations. Keywords: acute cardiac drug therapy, time-varying confounding, inverse probability treatment weighting, Cox regression Graphical Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of mortality worldwide. 1 According to Statistics Netherlands data, 2 from 1950 to 2021, the mortality caused by CVD among all causes showed a trend of initially rising and then slowly decreasing from 2000. However, CVD still account for a substantial proportion of all causes of death in the Netherlands. Hyperlipidemia is a prevalent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. 3 Anti-hyperlipidemic drug treatments such as statins are effective in regulating plasma Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) concentrations, thus reducing the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with cardiovascular disease. 3,4 It is also important to consider the issue of persistence with statin therapy, as studies have indicated poor adherence to this treatment. 5 In clinical practice, statins and fibrates are frequently prescribed as anti-hyperlipidemic drugs, no evidence of a difference between statins and fibrates in reducing cardiovascular events, though statins with fewer adverse effects compared to fibrates. 6 Based on cardiovascular risk management guidelines in the Netherlands, 7 atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, or simvastatin are recommended for patients with a desired LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction of less than 40%, while only atorvastatin or rosuvastatin are advised to achieve reductions greater than 40%. In comparative effectiveness cohort studies, atorvastatin demonstrated superior performance compared to simvastatin in preventing cardiovascular events. 8,9 However, it is important to acknowledge that the observed differences in outcomes between the two statins may not solely be due to the inherent characte -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?