1085 Evaluating Different Message Strategies from the AASM “Count on Sleep” Campaign to Promote Awareness About OSA

Rebecca Robbins,Sarah Honaker,Sameh Morkous,Lourdes DelRosso

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.01085

IF: 6.313

2024-04-20

SLEEP

Abstract:Abstract Introduction The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) initiated “Count on Sleep” in 2023, a public health campaign that was awarded to the AASM by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) ) and Prevention of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in 2021, with the goal of raising the awareness of Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among general practitioners and the public. Three campaign messages were developed and disseminated via social media. We examine the impact of these campaign messages using back-end analytics from the social media platform Meta. Methods We downloaded impressions (number of times the message was displayed on a screen), clicks, and shares for each of three public health messages from Meta, including demographic information for users (age, gender). Three message strategies were tested: positive outcome expectations (e.g., “improve your health”); negative outcome expectations (e.g., “increase your risk of health problems”); and partner-focus (e.g., “have you heard your partner snore?”). Results The campaign received a total of 142,607 impressions, divided into positive outcome expectation (n=120,062), negative outcome expectation (n=12,286) and partner-focus (n=10,259) messages. The campaign yielded a total of 3038 link clicks, with the highest number for positive outcome expectation (n=3,006), followed by negative outcome expectation (n=21) and partner-focus (n=11) messages. The total shares were 276, with most shares (165) for the negative outcome post. Female users were more likely to engage with the positive outcome (39% v.28%) and negative outcome (34% v.25%) messages; engagement did not vary by sex for the partner-focus message (36% v.36%). Those 65 years and older had the highest engagement of all age groups (negative outcome: 54%; positive outcome expectation: 47%; and partner-focus: 40%). Conclusion Although the positive outcome message strategy received the most engagement and clicks to the website for more information, the message using a negative outcome approach was the most frequently shared message. Females and older adults were more likely to engage with OSA messaging. These results provide information about the reach and uptake of OSA messages with different frames (e.g., negative/positive outcomes, partner-focus). Support (if any) This project was funded by the CDC. Additional support from the NIH (K01HL150339).

neurosciences,clinical neurology