Efficacy of long‐term low carbohydrate diets for patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Takahiro Ichikawa,Hiroshi Okada,Junya Hironaka,Hanako Nakajima,Takuro Okamura,Saori Majima,Takafumi Senmaru,Emi Ushigome,Naoko Nakanishi,Masahide Hamaguchi,Erina Joo,Kenichiro Shide,Michiaki Fukui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.14271
2024-07-26
Journal of Diabetes Investigation
Abstract:Our study did not show significant differences in changes in glycated hemoglobin, weight loss, blood pressure and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol between long‐term low‐carbohydrate diets and control diets. However, long‐term low‐carbohydrate diets were found to be associated with greater elevation in high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and decrease in triglyceride. These findings suggest the effectiveness of long‐term low‐carbohydrate diets in treating dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Aims/Introduction Efficacy of long‐term low‐carbohydrate diets (LCD) to improve glycemic management for type 2 diabetes remains controversial. Thus, we investigated the association between long‐term LCD and glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Database for articles published up to June 2023, and included randomized controlled trials conducted on LCD interventions for >12 months in adults with type 2 diabetes. Primary outcome was the difference in glycated hemoglobin between long‐term LCD and control groups. Additionally, we evaluated the differences in changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and weight between long‐term LCD and control groups. Results Six studies were identified and met the inclusion criteria. This study did not show significant differences in changes in glycated hemoglobin between long‐term LCD and control diets (standardized mean difference −0.11, 95% confidence interval −0.33 to 0.11, P = 0.32). As with glycemic control, there were no significant differences in the changes in weight loss, blood pressure, and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol between long‐term LCD and control diets. However, long‐term LCD were associated with greater elevation in high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (standardized mean difference 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.04–0.41; P = 0.02) and decrease in triglyceride (standardized mean difference −0.19; 95% confidence interval −0.37 to 0.02; P = 0.03) than that in control diets. Conclusions Our findings suggest efficacy of long‐term LCD in treating dyslipidemia in individuals with type 2 diabetes, but do not recommend long‐term LCD for glycemic control in the individuals.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?