Conversations centred on choice and autonomy might not improve end-of-life care

Louisa Polak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2259

2024-10-19

BMJ

Abstract:Few would disagree that it is bad when someone dies shortly after receiving medical treatment that their family thinks they would not have wanted. But I am concerned that Augst oversimplifies the challenges involved in avoiding this and that her proposals might have unintended adverse consequences.1 An enforceable "duty of candour," for example, might lead clinicians to override people's right to decline to talk about the future; frail older people, in particular, might prefer not to think about their death.2Rather than emphasising "autonomous decision making," it is important to remember that a health decision is often made through multiple encounters with multiple people, so autonomy is better seen not as individual but as "relational."3 In a process of making shared decisions, family, friends, and clinicians help the patient gather the information they want and clarify what matters to them, acknowledging that a decision is not set in stone—what matters might...

medicine, general & internal