Abstract:We consider the problem of allocating a set on indivisible items to players with private preferences in an efficient and fair way. We focus on valuations that have dichotomous marginals, in which the added value of any item to a set is either 0 or 1, and aim to design truthful allocation mechanisms (without money) that maximize welfare and are fair. For the case that players have submodular valuations with dichotomous marginals, we design such a deterministic truthful allocation mechanism. The allocation output by our mechanism is Lorenz dominating, and consequently satisfies many desired fairness properties, such as being envy-free up to any item (EFX), and maximizing the Nash Social Welfare (NSW). We then show that our mechanism with random priorities is envy-free ex-ante, while having all the above properties ex-post. Furthermore, we present several impossibility results precluding similar results for the larger class of XOS valuations. To gauge the robustness of our positive results, we also study $\epsilon$-dichotomous valuations, in which the added value of any item to a set is either non-positive, or in the range $[1, 1 + \epsilon]$. We show several impossibility results in this setting, and also a positive result: for players that have additive $\epsilon$-dichotomous valuations with sufficiently small $\epsilon$, we design a randomized truthful mechanism with strong ex-post guarantees. For $\rho = \frac{1}{1 + \epsilon}$, the allocations that it produces generate at least a $\rho$-fraction of the maximum welfare, and enjoy $\rho$-approximations for various fairness properties, such as being envy-free up to one item (EF1), and giving each player at least her maximin share.

Characterizing group strategy-proof rules in the object allocation problem with money

Fairness and efficiency in strategy-proof object allocation mechanisms

Best Cost-Sharing Rule Design for Selfish Bin Packing

On Strategy-Proof Allocation Without Payments or Priors

Strategic aspects of the probabilistic serial rule for the allocation of goods

Justified Fairness in House Allocation Problems: two Characterizations of Strategy-proof Mechanisms

Allocation rules are very generally vulnerable to the strategic withholding of endowments

Strategy-Proof Multidimensional Mechanism Design

Fair and Efficient Allocations Without Obvious Manipulations

Packaging for allocation

Optimal allocations with capacity constrained verification

Implementing Randomized Allocation Rules with Outcome-Contingent Transfers

Overbidding and underbidding in package allocation problems

Characterization of Group-Fair Social Choice Rules under Single-Peaked Preferences

Presenting objects for random allocation

On allocations that give intersecting groups their fair share

Sequential Mechanisms for Multi-type Resource Allocation

Cost Allocation and Strategyproof Mechanism for Cover-set Games

Repeated Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items

Strategy-proof Popular Mechanisms

Fair and Truthful Mechanisms for Dichotomous Valuations