Abstract:Policy Points Considerable investments have been made to build high-performing primary care systems in Canada. However, little is known about the extent to which change has occurred over the last decade with implementing programs and policies across all 13 provincial and territorial jurisdictions. There is significant variation in the degree of implementation of structural features of high-performing primary care systems across Canada. This study provides evidence on the state of primary care reform in Canada and offers insights into the opportunities based on changes that governments elsewhere have made to advance primary care transformation. Context: Despite significant investments to transform primary care, Canada lags behind its peers in providing timely access to regular doctors or places of care, timely access to care, developing interprofessional teams, and communication across health care settings. This study examines changes over the last decade (2012 to 2021) in policies across 13 provincial and territorial jurisdictions that address the structural features of high-performing primary care systems. Methods: A multiple comparative case study approach was used to explore changes in primary care delivery across 13 Canadian jurisdictions. Each case consisted of (1) qualitative interviews with academics, provincial health care leaders, and health care professionals and (2) a literature review of policies and innovations. Data for each case were thematically analyzed within and across cases, using 12 structural features of high-performing primary care systems to describe each case and assess changes over time. Findings: The most significant changes include adopting electronic medical records, investments in quality improvement training and support, and developing interprofessional teams. Progress was more limited in implementing primary care governance mechanisms, system coordination, patient enrollment, and payment models. The rate of change was slowest for patient engagement, leadership development, performance measurement, research capacity, and systematic evaluation of innovation. Conclusions: Progress toward building high-performing primary care systems in Canada has been slow and variable, with limited change in the organization and delivery of primary care. Canada's experience can inform innovation internationally by demonstrating how preexisting policy legacies constrain the possibilities for widespread primary care reform, with progress less pronounced in the attributes that impact physician autonomy. To accelerate primary care transformation in Canada and abroad, a national strategy and performance measurement framework is needed based on meaningful engagement of patients and other stakeholders. This must be accompanied by targeted funding investments and building strong data infrastructure for performance measurement to support rigorous research.

"We're sinking": a qualitative interview-based study on stakeholder perceptions of structural and process limitations to the Canadian healthcare system

Siloed mentality, health system suboptimization and the healthcare symphony: a Canadian perspective

Building High-Performing Primary Care Systems: After a Decade of Policy Change, Is Canada "Walking the Talk?"

Perceptions of Service Climate in a Canadian healthcare system

Health care reform: lessons from Canada.

Perspectives of structurally marginalised patients attending contextually tailored and integrated care practices in Canada: a focused ethnography study

Shifting paradigms: A collective and structural strategy for addressing healthcare inequity

Optimising the discharge process in internal medicine in Québec: A qualitative interpretive descriptive study to understand the challenges faced by healthcare professionals

Evaluating engagement with equity in Canadian provincial and territorial primary care policies: Results of a jurisdictional scan

Analysing 'big picture' policy reform mechanisms: the Australian health service safety and quality accreditation scheme

Standardising costs or standardising care? Qualitative evaluation of the implementation and impact of a hospital funding reform in Ontario, Canada

"We cobble together a storyline of system performance using a diversity of things": a qualitative study of perspectives on public health performance measurement in Canada

The importance of understanding and measuring health system structural, functional, and clinical integration

Senior stakeholder views on policies to foster a culture of openness in the English National Health Service: a qualitative interview study

Public Engagement in Canadian Health Policy: Looking Back, Taking Stock and Charting the Future

Improving access to inflammatory bowel disease care in Canada: The patient experience

'Safety is about partnership': Safety through the lens of patients and caregivers

Access to primary health care: perspectives of primary care physicians and community stakeholders

Leaders' perspectives on learning health systems: a qualitative study

Managing "socially admitted" patients in hospital: a qualitative study of health care providers' perceptions

Challenges and promising solutions to engaging patients in healthcare implementation in the United States: an environmental scan