Myopia Ballads Prevent Refractive Errors in Senior Children: A Three-Years Prospective Study

Yi Shao,Kang Yu,Biao Li,Li-Ying Tang,Bin Wang,You-Lan Min,Qian-Min Ge,Qiu-Yu Li,Chong-Gang Pei,Aiping Le

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556627

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Background: While evidence suggests that pharmacists can improve patient outcomes and satisfaction in primary care, their impact on healthcare systems is unclear. This review sought to identify key impacts of integration of pharmacists in primary care on health system indicators such as healthcare utilisation and costs.Methods: A systematic review of literature was carried out, examining EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, HMIC, CINAHL and CENTRAL, and reference lists of relevant studies. RCTs and observational studies were included, published up to June 2018, which reported outcomes of introduction of pharmacists into primary care. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Quality Assessment tool for RCTs, and the NIH National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Data were extracted from published reports and findings synthesised.Findings: Searches identified 3,058 studies; 28 met the inclusion criteria. Most included studies were of fair quality, but introduced risk of bias through lack of blinding. Pharmacists in primary care resulted in reduced use of GP appointments and reduced emergency department attendance, but increased primary care utilisation. While there was no impact on hospitalisations, there was some evidence of savings in overall health system costs, and medication costs.Interpretation: Integration of pharmacists in primary care may reduce GP workload, as well emergency department use. Further research is needed to clarify cost effectiveness and long-term impact on health system outcomes including effects on hospitalisations.Funding: Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and NIHR CLAHRC North West London.Declaration of Interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Ethical Approval: The present study was approved by the Medical research Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. Written informed consent was obtained from all individuals enrolled in the study.