Making a choice? Vocational Training and Decision-Making for theUndereducated and the Unemployed in Germany and the United States

M. Fleige,Amy D. Rose

Abstract:This paper compares the German and U.S. systems of career decision-making and re-training for the unemployed. Findings indicate similar issues in terms of pedagogy and the emphasis on development of systems, but differences in organizational specifics and the factors deemed to be important. Introduction and research problem Job training for the unemployed and the undereducated has received a great deal of notice in recent years. In the United States, massive efforts have been developed to streamline the job training process and to ensure that careers choices are tied to actual career pathways and job opportunities. In Germany, changing models of job training and career paths for unemployed and underemployed have been much discussed (Reutter, 2010). Each country has developed its own approaches to dealing with the unemployed and job training and career counseling. While, regardless the given differences in the fields of initial and continuing vocational training, both countries have struggled to understand what makes a successful program, it is clear that parts of the population are not finding lifelong work. In this paper, we begin an examination of the policies and programs in place for this population with particular attention to models of career counseling and career decision making. Over the past thirty years, much has been written and researched about the failure of economic policies to resolve reskilling issues. The issues and programs are different in the U.S and Germany, but both have tested their respective outcomes with mixed results. This paper is the beginning of a larger cross-national project. Its purpose is to examine the federal initiatives in Germany and the United States related to the process of career decisionmaking for the unemployed and/or the undereducated. The specific research questions include: What are the federal initiatives in Germany and the United States related to the career pathways of adults? What are the structural differences and similarities related to the policy’s implementation? How does the implementation affect particular programs such as the career one-stops in the U. S. and the programs of the Federal Employment Agency in Germany? Finally, we ask how both programs present and implement models of career counseling. While career decision-making is not an understudied area, it has not been adequately studied for this particular population, especially from the perspective of adult education research (e.g. Rose, Giordano, & Click, 2004; Enoch, 2011). Additionally, much of this work has been conducted in a cultural vacuum. We feel that studying the career decision making processes of adults cross-nationally will add to our understanding of how adults throughout the world make decisions about career change and job searching as well as what ultimately helps and what hinders decision-making from the perspective of the individual. . Theoretical Framework and Method

Sociology,Political Science,Education