A nanoscale Ni/ ZrO 2 catalyst coated with Al 2 O 3 for carbon dioxide reforming of methane

Xiaorui Wang,Xiaoli Bai,Yu Guo,Qirui Liu,Shengfu Ji,Zhou‐jun Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6562
IF: 3.709
2020-09-19
Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> BACKGROUND</h3><p>CO<sub>2</sub> reforming of methane, also known as dry reforming of methane, has received significant attention because this technology can convert notorious greenhouse gases (CH<sub>4</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub>) into useful syngas (H<sub>2</sub>/CO). However, this technology still hasn't been commercialized, primarily due to the lack of feasible catalysts. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> RESULTS</h3><p>Based on zirconia (ZrO<sub>2</sub>) nanoparticles with pure monoclinic (m) or tetragonal (t) crystal phase, three nickel (Ni) catalysts (Ni/m‐ZrO<sub>2</sub>, Ni/t‐ZrO<sub>2</sub> and Ni/m‐ZrO<sub>2</sub>@Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) have been synthesized for CO<sub>2</sub> reforming of methane. The Ni/t‐ZrO<sub>2</sub> catalyst exhibited lowest reforming activity with CH<sub>4</sub> conversion of 15.5% at 700 °C under 1 atm with a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 96 000 mL/(h gcat). The Ni/m‐ZrO<sub>2</sub> catalyst showed much higher initial activity but underwent severe deactivation, over which CH<sub>4</sub> conversion decreased from 56.1% to 33.4% after 300 min of reaction. The nanocomposite Ni/m‐ZrO<sub>2</sub>@Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalyst with confinement effect possessed the best activity and good stability. Specifically, its CH<sub>4</sub> conversion decreased merely from 60.2% to 55.3% after 24 h of reaction. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> CONCLUSION</h3><p>Structural characterizations demonstrate that limited specific surface area and weak metal‐support interactions existed on the Ni/t‐ZrO<sub>2</sub> catalyst, which led to large Ni nanoparticles and thus poor reforming activity. Both Ni/m‐ZrO<sub>2</sub> and Ni/m‐ZrO<sub>2</sub>@Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalysts had high specific surface area and tiny Ni nanoparticles, which may rationalize the high reforming activity. The improved stability on the Ni/m‐ZrO<sub>2</sub>@Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalyst was mainly related to the alleviated carbon deposition endowed by enriched surface basicity and strengthened metal‐support interactions. </p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p></section>
engineering, chemical,biotechnology & applied microbiology, environmental,chemistry, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?