Large differences between observed and expected Ecuadorian deforestation from 2001 to 2009: a counterfactual simulation approach
Baltazar Calvas,Luz Maria Castro,Mengistie Kindu,Logan Bingham,Karla Pintado,Jonathan Torres Celi,Thomas Knoke,Jorge Cueva-Ortiz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-024-02253-0
IF: 4.704
2024-06-02
Regional Environmental Change
Abstract:Ensuring the integrity of the world's forests is indispensable for mitigating climate change, combatting biodiversity loss, and protecting the livelihoods of rural communities. While many strategies have been developed to address deforestation across different geographic scales, measuring their impact against a fluctuating background of market-driven forest loss is notoriously challenging. In this article, we (1) asses deforestation in Ecuador using a dynamic, counterfactual baseline that excludes non-market factors, (2) identify periods of reduced and excess deforestation, and (3) assess the economic consequences of associated CO 2 emissions using the social cost of carbon metric. We construct a counterfactual market-forces-only reference scenario by simulating heterogeneous profit-seeking agents making satisficing land-use allocation decisions under uncertainty. The model simulates a reference scenario for 2001–2022, a period encompassing dollarization, the beginning of a constitution granting inalienable rights to nature, and the launch of the largest payments for ecosystem services program in Ecuador's history. On this period, total deforestation was approximately 20% lower than expected in a market-forces-only scenario (9540 vs.12,000 km 2 ). The largest deviation occurred in 2001–2009, when observed deforestation was 43.6% lower than expected (3720 vs 6590 km 2 ). From 2010 onwards, deforestation appears to be market-driven. We assess the economic value of avoided CO 2 emissions at US 3.1 billion considering a 1% risk of loss from 2022 onwards. We discuss contributing factors that likely shaped periods of reduced and excess deforestation and stress the need to use realistic baselines.
environmental sciences,environmental studies