Transcriptomic profiling and immuno‐histological characterization of synovial biopsies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) suggest two broad categories, with significant overlap with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

Clément Triaille,Gaëlle Tilman,Charlotte A. Baert,Tatiana Sokolova,Axelle Loriot,Adrien Nzeusseu‐Toukap,Laurent Meric de Bellefon,Christine Galant,Cécile Boulanger,Joao E. Fonseca,Caroline Bouzin,Patrick Durez,Bernard R Lauwerys,Nisha Limaye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42922
2024-05-25
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Abstract:Objectives To characterize transcriptomic profiles and immune cell composition and distribution in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) synovial biopsies, assess for associations of these features with clinical parameters, and compare JIA and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) synovial features. Methods RNASeq was performed on 24 samples, with pathway analysis and inference of relative abundance of immune cell subsets based on gene expression data. Two multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry (IHC) panels were performed on 28 samples (including 13 on which RNASeq was performed), staining for CD206‐ classical and CD206+ non‐classical macrophages, CD8+ and CD4+ T and B lymphocytes. Data were compared to a published series of early RA synovial biopsies. Results Pathway analysis of the (n=339) most variably expressed genes identified a B and plasma cell signature as the main driver of heterogeneity in JIA synovia, with strong overlap between JIA and RA synovitis. Multiplex IHC confirmed heterogeneity of immune cell infiltration. M1‐like macrophage rich synovial lining was associated with greater lining hypertrophy and higher pan (CD45+) immune and CD8+ T cell infiltration. Conclusion Our study indicates significant similarities between JIA and RA synovitis. Similar to RA, JIA synovia may be broadly categorized into two groups: (i) those with an inflammatory/adaptive immune transcriptomic signature, M1‐like macrophage and CD8+ T cell infiltration and thicker, M1‐like macrophage rich synovial lining, and (ii) those with an M2‐like macrophage transcriptomic signature, greater M2/M1‐like macrophage ratios and thinner, M2‐like macrophage rich synovial lining. Synovial features were not significantly associated with clinical parameters, likely due to group size and heterogeneity.
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?