Abstract:Objective: To compile the available literature regarding the usefulness, methodology used, and limitations of ACEs screening in a pediatric clinical sample, to prevent adverse health outcomes. Introduction: Several studies have found an association between the presence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and the development of negative health outcomes, however the usefulness of screening for this condition and how to do so appropriately has not been established. Methods: We included observational, descriptive, analytical, and experimental studies, qualitative studies, systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, and health policies that include the pediatric population from 3 to 17 years of age in a clinical setting. Studies in languages other than Spanish and English, protocols, and validation studies were excluded. The search strategy was designed using the PRISMA-S protocol to locate published and unpublished studies using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, LiLACS, PsycArticles and CINAHL databases and grey literature in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Studies in Spanish and English published since 2012 were included. The Rayyan platform was implemented to remove duplicates and for independent article selection by each author, with conflicts resolved through discussion. Data was extracted into an Excel database, highlighting information related to the objectives of the scoping review. After analyzing the data, we present them in different tables that summarize the findings of the review, with a narrative description. Results: Our search yielded 8143 studies, from which 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies varied in design, with most conducted in the United States, they were published between 2012 and 2024. The review identified several ACE screening tools (15), with an average response time of 15 minutes. Although some tools showed promise in identifying children at risk for adverse outcomes, significant gaps remain in the consistency and effectiveness of screening methods. Barriers such as lack of training for healthcare personnel, a lack of approach to patients with positive results, limited resources for follow-up care, and cultural differences in interpreting ACEs were often highlighted. There was no evidence of adequate standardization of screening methods, how to use them, and how to properly identify and categorize the presence of an ACE in childhood. Conclusions: This scoping review highlights the potential of screening for ACEs in pediatric settings to prevent long-term health issues. However, the lack of standardized tools, protocols, and evidence of long-term benefits hinders its implementation. Although the association between ACEs and negative health outcomes is well-established, there is insufficient evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of screening. Cultural factors, especially in countries like Colombia, further complicate the adaptation of screening tools. The review suggests that a multidisciplinary, family-centered approach and training in trauma-informed care are essential. More research is needed to standardize ACE screening and evaluate its effectiveness in reducing health issues related to ACEs.

Disparities in Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences

Clinician actions in response to Adverse Childhood Experience (ACE) screening

Pediatric ACEs Screening and Referral: Facilitators, Barriers, and Opportunities for Improvement

Caregiver Report of Adverse Childhood Events: Comparison of Self-Administered and Telephone Questionnaires

Differences in Exposures to Adverse Childhood Experiences by Primary Source of Health Care, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2019-2020

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Family-Centered Care

Screening for adverse childhood experiences in pediatrics: A randomized trial of aggregate-level versus item-level response screening formats

Screening for adverse childhood experiences in pediatric clinical settings: a scoping review

Disparities in adverse childhood experiences by race/ethnicity, gender, and economic status: Intersectional analysis of a nationally representative sample

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Adverse Childhood Experiences and Mental Health

Abstract B007: Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in over- and under-screening of cervical cancer among a national sample of commercially insured individuals

Adverse childhood experiences and mental and physical health disparities: the moderating effect of race and implications for social work

A Short Adverse Experiences Measure Among Mothers of Young Children

Adverse childhood experiences and its association with emotional and behavioral problems in U.S. children of Latino immigrants

Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Adverse Childhood Experiences and Selected Health-Related Behaviors and Problems Among Maryland Adolescents

Expanding adverse child experiences to inequality and racial discrimination

Screening for Adverse Childhood Experiences in Adolescents Using the Bright Futures Previsit Questionnaire

Poor Individual Risk Classification From Adverse Childhood Experiences Screening

Trends in prevalence of adverse childhood experiences by sociodemographic factors in the United States: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2009-2022

Examining the prevalence of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among justice-involved youth in the U.S.: The importance of accounting for race/ethnicity, gender, and gendered racial/ethnic groups

Adverse childhood experiences: a meta‐analysis of prevalence and moderators among half a million adults in 206 studies