Carbon Emission Governance Zones at the County Level to Promote Sustainable Development

He Zhang,Jingyi Peng,Dahlia Yu,Lie You,Rui Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020197
IF: 3.905
2021-02-15
Land
Abstract:Low-carbon governance at the county level has been an important issue for sustainable development due to the large contributions to carbon emission. However, the experiences of carbon emission governance at the county level are lacking. This paper discusses 5 carbon emission governance zones for 1753 counties. The zoning is formed according to a differentiated zoning method based on a multi-indicator evaluation to judge if the governance had better focus and had formulated a differentiated carbon emission governance system. According to zoning results, there is 1 high-carbon governance zone, 2 medium-carbon governance zones, and 2 low-carbon zones. The extensive high-carbon governance zone and medium-carbon zones are key governance areas, in which the counties are mainly located in the northern plain areas and southeast coastal areas and have contributed 51.88% of total carbon emissions. This paper proposes differentiated governance standards for each indicator of the 5 zones. The differentiated zoning method mentioned in this paper can be applied to other governance issues of small-scale regions.
environmental studies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to solve several key problems in carbon emission governance at the county level: 1. **Identifying elements of carbon emission governance**: By constructing the causal chains among county development levels, carbon emission governance and carbon emissions, the key governance elements that affect carbon emissions are identified. This step is crucial for understanding the main driving factors of carbon emissions in different regions. 2. **Establishing a differentiated carbon emission governance indicator system**: Based on the above - identified governance elements, the initial governance indicators that actually have an impact on carbon emissions are screened out to form a revised indicator system. These indicators can more accurately reflect the characteristics of carbon emissions in different regions, thus providing a basis for formulating specific governance measures. 3. **Conducting carbon emission governance zoning**: Using the cluster analysis method, 1,753 counties are classified according to the performance of each region on carbon emission governance indicators, and a county - level carbon emission governance zoning map is drawn. This zoning method not only reflects the differences in external carbon emissions, but also reveals the differences in internal governance motives. 4. **Setting differentiated governance standards**: Referring to the current "County Management Specifications" and combining the actual situations of each zone, a differentiated governance system including key governance indicators and their low - carbon target thresholds is established for each zone. This helps local governments formulate specific and feasible low - carbon management measures according to the actual situation, thereby effectively reducing carbon emissions nationwide. In summary, the core issue of this research is to help policy - makers develop differentiated and localized carbon emission control and reduction strategies applicable to different regions by constructing a governance - oriented carbon emission zoning system, which is of great significance for achieving sustainable development goals.