Abstract:BackgroundSmall number of clusters and large variation of cluster sizes commonly exist in cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) and are often the critical factors affecting the validity and efficiency of statistical analyses. F tests are commonly used in the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) to test intervention effects in CRTs. The most challenging issue for the approximate Wald F test is the estimation of the denominator degrees of freedom (DDF). Some DDF approximation methods have been proposed, but their small sample performances in analysing binary outcomes in CRTs with few heterogeneous clusters are not well studied.MethodsThe small sample performances of five DDF approximations for the F test are compared and contrasted under CRT frameworks with simulations. Specifically, we illustrate how the intraclass correlation (ICC), sample size, and the variation of cluster sizes affect the type I error and statistical power when different DDF approximation methods in GLMM are used to test intervention effect in CRTs with binary outcomes. The results are also illustrated using a real CRT dataset.ResultsOur simulation results suggest that the Between-Within method maintains the nominal type I error rates even when the total number of clusters is as low as 10 and is robust to the variation of the cluster sizes. The Residual and Containment methods have inflated type I error rates when the cluster number is small (<30) and the inflation becomes more severe with increased variation in cluster sizes. In contrast, the Satterthwaite and Kenward-Roger methods can provide tests with very conservative type I error rates when the total cluster number is small (<30) and the conservativeness becomes more severe as variation in cluster sizes increases. Our simulations also suggest that the Between-Within method is statistically more powerful than the Satterthwaite or Kenward-Roger method in analysing CRTs with heterogeneous cluster sizes, especially when the cluster number is small.ConclusionWe conclude that the Between-Within denominator degrees of freedom approximation method for F tests should be recommended when the GLMM is used in analysing CRTs with binary outcomes and few heterogeneous clusters, due to its type I error properties and relatively higher power.

Some approximate tests for repeated measurement designs

Tests for a Multiple-Sample Problem in High Dimensions

Approximate Power for Repeated-Measures ANOVA Lacking Sphericity

A comparison of recent approaches to the analysis of repeated measurements

Estimates of test size for several test procedures based on conventional variance ratios in the repeated measures design

Wald tests for variance-adjusted equivalence assessment with normal endpoints

Tests for Covariance Structures with High-Dimensional Repeated Measurements

Two New Tests for Equality of Several Covariance Functions

Tests of sphericity of normal distributions and the analysis of repeated measures designs

Exact Multivariate Tests - A New Effective Principle of Controlled Model Choice

Inference for Repeated Measures Models under Heteroscedasticity

Inferences on the difference and ratio of the means of two inverse Gaussian distributions

Evaluating the robustness of repeated measures analyses: The case of small sample sizes and nonnormal data

Approximating Null Distribution of the M-Test Statistics in Linear Models

An Approximate Randomization Test for the High-Dimensional Two-Sample Behrens-Fisher Problem under Arbitrary Covariances

Tests for inter-subject and total variabilities under crossover designs.

Two-sample tests for multivariate functional data with applications

Optimal exact tests for composite alternative hypotheses on cross tabulated data

Finite sample t-tests for high-dimensional means

Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance

Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials