Quantifying Methane Emissions from the Global Scale Down to Point Sources Using Satellite Observations of Atmospheric Methane
D. Jacob,D. Varon,D. Cusworth,P. Dennison,C. Frankenberg,R. Gautam,L. Guanter,J. Kelley,J. Mckeever,L. Ott,B. Poulter,Z. Qu,A. Thorpe,J. Worden,R. Duren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9617-2022
IF: 6.3
2022-01-01
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Abstract:Abstract. We review the capability of current and scheduled satelliteobservations of atmospheric methane in the shortwave infrared (SWIR) toquantify methane emissions from the global scale down to point sources. Wecover retrieval methods, precision and accuracy requirements, inverse andmass balance methods for inferring emissions, source detection thresholds,and observing system completeness. We classify satellite instruments as areaflux mappers and point source imagers, with complementary attributes. Areaflux mappers are high-precision (<1 %) instruments with 0.1–10 kmpixel size designed to quantify total methane emissions on regional toglobal scales. Point source imagers are fine-pixel (<60 m)instruments designed to quantify individual point sources by imaging of theplumes. Current area flux mappers include GOSAT (2009–present), whichprovides a high-quality record for interpretation of long-term methanetrends, and TROPOMI (2018–present), which provides global continuous dailymapping to quantify emissions on regional scales. These instruments alreadyprovide a powerful resource to quantify national methane emissions insupport of the Paris Agreement. Current point source imagers include theGHGSat constellation and several hyperspectral and multispectral landimaging sensors (PRISMA, Sentinel-2, Landsat-8/9, WorldView-3), withdetection thresholds in the 100–10 000 kg h−1 range that enablemonitoring of large point sources. Future area flux mappers, includingMethaneSAT, GOSAT-GW, Sentinel-5, GeoCarb, and CO2M, will increase thecapability to quantify emissions at high resolution, and the MERLIN lidarwill improve observation of the Arctic. The averaging times required by areaflux mappers to quantify regional emissions depend on pixel size, retrievalprecision, observation density, fraction of successful retrievals, andreturn times in a way that varies with the spatial resolution desired. Asimilar interplay applies to point source imagers between detectionthreshold, spatial coverage, and return time, defining an observing systemcompleteness. Expanding constellations of point source imagers includingGHGSat and Carbon Mapper over the coming years will greatly improveobserving system completeness for point sources through dense spatialcoverage and frequent return times.