Quantitative microbial risk assessment and sensitivity analysis for workers exposed to pathogenic bacterial bioaerosols under various aeration modes in two wastewater treatment plants

Yan-Huan Chen,Cheng Yan,Ya-Fei Yang,Jia-Xin Ma,Yan-huan Chen,Ya-fei Yang,Jia-xin Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142615
2021-02-01
Abstract:<p>Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) could emit a large amount of bioaerosols containing pathogenic bacteria. Assessing the health risks of exposure to these bioaerosols by using quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) is important to protect workers in WWTPs. However, the relative impacts of the stochastic input variables on the health risks determined in QMRA remain vague. Hence, this study performed a Monte Carlo simulation-based QMRA case study for workers exposing to <em>S</em>. <em>aureus</em> or <em>E</em>. <em>coli</em> bioaerosols and a sensitivity analysis in two WWTPs with various aeration modes. Results showed that when workers equipped without personal protective equipment (PPE) were exposed to <em>S</em>. <em>aureus</em> or <em>E</em>. <em>coli</em> bioaerosol in the two WWTPs, the annual probability of infection considerably exceeded the U.S. EPA benchmark (≤10E-4 pppy), and the disease burden did not satisfy the WHO benchmark (≤10E-6 DALYs pppy) (except exposure to <em>E</em>. <em>coli</em> bioaerosol for disease health risk burden). Nevertheless, the use of PPE effectively reduced the annual infection health risk to an acceptable level and converted the disease health risk burden to a highly acceptable level. Referring to the sensitivity analysis, the contribution of mechanical aeration modes to the variability of the health risks was absolutely dominated in the WWTPs. On the aeration mode that showed high exposure concentration, the three input exposure parameters (exposure time, aerosol ingestion rate, and breathing rate) had a great impact on health risks. The health risks were also prone to being highly influenced by the various choices of the dose–response model and related parameters. Current research systematically delivered new data and a novel perspective on the sensitivity analysis of QMRA. Then, management decisions could be executed by authorities on the basis of the results of this sensitivity analysis to reduce related occupational health risks of workers in WWTPs.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Aims to Address This paper aims to assess the health risks to workers exposed to pathogenic bioaerosols (such as *Staphylococcus aureus* and *Escherichia coli*) in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and to conduct a sensitivity analysis through Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA). Specifically: 1. **Health Risk Assessment**: The study evaluates the annual infection probability (P(a)inf) and disease burden (DB) for workers exposed to pathogenic bioaerosols under different aeration modes using the QMRA method. 2. **Impact of Personal Protective Equipment**: It explores the impact of using personal protective equipment (PPE) on health risks. 3. **Sensitivity Analysis**: Sensitivity analysis is conducted through Monte Carlo simulation to identify the relative impact of various input variables on health risk changes and to determine the main influencing factors. 4. **Impact of Aeration Modes**: The study examines the impact of different aeration modes (rotating disc aeration, inverted umbrella aeration, and microporous aeration) on health risks. The overall goal is to provide reasonable occupational health management recommendations for workers in wastewater treatment plants to reduce related occupational health risks.