Abstract:The aim of this work is not only to demonstrate how to introduce thorium as an alternative nuclear fuel into pressurized water reactors, but also to examine the several advantages that (Th, U 233 , Pu) has over (Th, U 233 ) and (Th, Pu) fuels when (U 233 O 2 ) is mixed with (Th-Pu)O 2 fuel. To investigate these advantages, three thorium fuels, (Th, U 233 ), (Th-U 233 -Pu) and (Th-Pu) are simulated and analyzed by the MCNPX 2.7 code. The reactor safety aspects of these fuels are compared with those of the reference UO 2 fuel. The concentration of Th-233 and fissile isotopes is adjusted to obtain criticality (Keff = 1.03) at the same burnup value (35 GWd/tonne) for all fuel types. Based on the predicted results, the author revealed that: 1) 56 % of plutonium (238-242) is depleted in the case of (Th-U 233 -Pu), while 41 % of plutonium is depleted in the (Th-Pu) at 60 GWd/tonne. This result indicates that (Th-U 233 -Pu) is more proliferation-resistant than (Th-Pu). 2) In terms of improving the quantity of radioactive waste, (Th, U 233 , Pu) model produces 0.6 and 0.9 times the amount of Am (241-243) and Cm (242-244) in UO 2 , respectively. On the other hand, (Th, Pu) fuel produces about 7 times the amount of Am and 8 times the amount of Cm in UO 2 fuel. 3) The fuel temperature coefficient (FTC) and moderator temperature coefficient (MTC) of (Th-U 233 -Pu) are more negative than that of UO 2 and (Th-U 233 ) at the early stages of fuel burnup (0–5) GWd/tonne.4) the total mass of fissile isotopes in (Th-U 233 -Pu) is greater than that of UO 2 and (Th-U 233 ) and as a result, the fuel life time is longer in the case of (Th-U 233 -Pu). 4) The conversion ratio provided by (Th-U 233 -Pu) is greater than that provided by UO 2 and (Th-U 233 ).This behavior is expected owing to the hardening of neutron spectrum in (Th-U 233 -Pu). 5) The peaking factors are lower in the case of (Th-U 233 -Pu) compared to (Th-Pu). 6) The concentration of xenon and samarium is noticeably lower for (Th-U 233 -Pu) in comparison with (Th-Pu) and consequently, the time required for restarting the reactor is accelerated.

Why Only U-235 and Pu-239? Classroom-Level Graphs for Understanding Heavy-Element Weaponizability Factors

The Taming of Plutonium: Pu Metallurgy and the Manhattan Project

Production of Pa-U Fuel with Proliferation Resistance by 14 MeV Neutron for Long-life Core

240Pu/239Pu isotopic ratio measurements in micrometric Pu and MOX particles using Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry

The transuranic elements and the island of stability

Particle emission from irradiated VVER-1200 fuel with Am burnable absorber

Activities of Pu and Am isotopes and isotopic ratios in a soil contaminated by weapons-grade plutonium

Nuclear Science for the Manhattan Project and Comparison to Today’s ENDF Data

Reaction Rate Ratios for Recent Fast Metal Experiments with Large Plutonium Masses

Isotopic fingerprinting of the world's first nuclear device using post-detonation materials

Plutonium-Based Heavy-Fermion Systems

Depleted-Uranium Weapons: the Whys and Wherefores

Denaturing Ex-Weapons Plutonium

Reactors as a source of antineutrinos: the effect of fuel loading and burnup for mixed oxide fuels

Employing ternary fission of $^{242}$Pu as a probe of very neutron rich matter

Improving the reactor safety aspects by the implementation of (Th-U 233 -Pu) fuel in a PWR assembly

Isotopic trends of quasifission and fusion-fission in the reactions $^{48}$Ca+$^{239,244}$Pu

Heavy and superheavy elements production in high intensive fluxes of explosive process

Assessing the Risk of Proliferation via Fissile Material Breeding in ARC-class Fusion Power Plants

Conceptual Design Study on Plutonium-238 Production in a Multi-Purpose High Flux Reactor

Methodology for Multiparameter Evaluation of Barriers Against Proliferation of Minor Actinides