Abstract:Background. Dynamic changes in international economic relations and trade for thorough analysis and forecasting require an adequate paradigm of international trade theory, which would take into account not only economic and political factors of its development, but also the diverse civilizational context of the world community, which determines mental, social and cultural features of the development of a country. Problem research state. Problems of political economy in international trade to some extent affect the research of P. Krugman, M. Obstfeld, J. Frieden, E. Helpman, P. S. Afontsev, A. Mazaraki, T. Melnyk, V. Panchenko, N. Reznikova and others. But the structure of its methodological discourse and the subject of its research remain unclear. The aim of the articleis to clarify the political and economic discourse of the theory of international trade. Materials and methods. The materials of the research were the works of domestic and foreign specialists. In the process of preparing the article, general scientific research methods were used: historical, logical analysis, synthesis and abstraction. Results. Political economy is a normative manifestation of economic theory, which is formed under the influence of socio-economic and political concepts, the formed goals of social development. The subject of political economy of international trade – economic and socio-political relations that determine and accompany international trade and determine the goals and content of trade policy of its subjects. It is proposed to expand the mechanism of formation of relative advantages and trade policy of the country by including factors that determine not only its economic potential and specialization, but also the risks that may be caused by political decisions. It is argued that the problem of «protectionism vs liberalism» in international trade at the state level will always exist. It turns out that the problem of justice in international economic relations and trade is determined by the civilizational content of the development of countries, in which human capital plays a crucial role. Conclusion. The paradigm of political economy in international trade should be based on an expanded interpretation of relative benefits by assessing the impact of economic, social and political institutionson them, the peculiarities of national trade policies.

Political economy of peace and war

Notes on the political economy of war

Political economy revisited: structures and objectives at the systemic level

The political economy of the original "Thucydides' Trap": a conflict economics perspective on the Peloponnesian war

A Path to Peace or a Source of Conflict:Debates on the Role of Economic Interdependence in Interstate Relations

Seeing the Lexus for the Olive Trees? Public Opinion, Economic Interdependence, and Interstate Conflict

Economic games for the study of peace

On The Economic Mechanics Of Warfare

Desperate Measures: The Effects of Economic Isolation on Warring Powers

Morality and political economy from the vantage point of economics

Militarized Conflict, Trade, and Economic Development in a Structural Equation Model With Spatial Considerations

When Do Conflicting Political Relations Affect International Trade?

Does economic globalization promote civil peace in developing countries?

Economics cannot isolate itself from political theory: a mathematical demonstration

Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War

War And Peace: Arthur Cecil Pigou As A Public Intellectual During World War I

What Is European Integration Really About? A Political Guide for Economists

POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CONTENT OF THE THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

What Do Economists Know?

Ukraine War: Policy Miscalculations or Contradictions of Capitalism?

Role of Economy in Foreign Policy: An Appraisal of US-China Trade War in the Prism of Political Economy