Abstract:Background: Among the research on the influencing factors of environmental information disclosure, scholars rarely identify the factors from the perspective of the enterprise’s external environment, especially peer enterprise behavior. In fact, the disclosure of environmental information by most enterprises in China is still only voluntary, and the form of disclosure is so chaotic that it is easy to be influenced by other enterprises. Objective: This study aimed to determine whether a firm's EID is affected by peer firms and contribute to the existing literature on the influencing factors of EID. objective: The purpose of this article is to obtain a conclusion that a company''s environmental disclosure is influenced by its peer companies and to suggest practical implications for environmental regulation. Methods: An analytical framework incorporating the herd behavior hypothesis, the legitimate theory, and the stakeholder theory is constructed, and fixed effect estimation, as well as a two-stage least square, is used to test the hypotheses. Results: There is a peer effect on environmental information disclosure of high-polluting firms. It has been observed that the focal firm imitates the disclosure behavior of small peer firms more than the large peer firms. Moreover, a peer effect of environmental disclosure on sensitive and non-sensitive information is also reported, but the peer effect on sensitive information is larger than that on non-sensitive information. Conclusion: First, policymakers need to realize that there is a peer effect involved in EID among high-polluting firms and improve the binding force of environmental regulations. Second, there are “demonstration effects” involved in EID. In the practice of regulations on disclosure, the smaller firms need to be under stricter scrutiny and set as models of EID to improve the efficiency of supervision and regulation. Third, enterprises have a stronger peer effect on the disclosure of sensitive information. Governments should strengthen the supervision of sensitive information disclosure.

Relative Performance Evaluation and Strategic Peer‐Harming Disclosures

The Spillover Effects of Innovation Content Disclosure in MD&A

Peer Competitive Threats, Common Customers, and Strategic News Disclosure

Governance, CEO Power, and Relative Performance Evaluation Effectiveness

Peer Effects in Corporate Disclosure Decisions

Rocking the Boat: How Relative Performance Evaluation Affects Corporate Risk Taking

Informative or distracting: CSR disclosure of peer firms and analyst forecast accuracy

Director self-dealing: Evidence from compensation peer groups

Torpedo Your Competition: Strategic Reporting and Peer Firm IPO

The Role of Common Risk in the Effectiveness of Explicit Relative Performance Evaluation

CEO Compensation and Relative Company Performance Evaluation

Peer Effects of Corporate Disclosures: Evidence From the Registration-Based IPO System in China

Board Interlock Networks and the Use of Relative Performance Evaluation

Peer Effects and Disclosure Timing: Evidence from Earnings Announcements

Boardroom backscratching and stock price crash risk

Peer effects of corporate product quality information disclosure: Learning and competition

The effects of executive compensation and outside monitoring on firms’ pre-repurchase disclosure behavior and post-repurchase performance

Stock Return or Sales Growth? Multiple Performance Feedback and Strategic Investments Under Securities Analysts’ Earnings Pressure

Peer effects on corporate environmental protection: Competition, information cascades or career concerns?

Transparency versus Performance in Financial Markets: The Role of CSR Communications

Peer Effect on Environmental Information Disclosure: Evidence from High-polluting Industries in China