Abstract:A measure of correlation or strength of association between random variables is the correlation coefficient. In scientific research, correlation analysis is most often carried out using various correlation coefficients without explaining why this particular coefficient was chosen and what the resulting value of this coefficient means. The article discusses Spearman correlation coefficient, Kendall correlation coefficient, phi (Yule) correlation coefficient, Cramér’s correlation coefficient, Matthews correlation coefficient, Fechner correlation coefficient, Tschuprow correlation coefficient, rank-biserial correlation coefficient, point-biserial correlation coefficient, as well as association coefficient and contingency coefficient. The criteria for applying each of the coefficients are given. It is shown how to establish the significance (insignificance) of the resulting correlation coefficient. The scales in which the correlated variables should be located for the coefficients under consideration are presented. Spearman rank correlation coefficient and other nonparametric indicators are independent of the distribution law, and that is why they are very useful. They make it possible to measure the contingency between such attributes that cannot be directly measured, but can be expressed by points or other conventional units that allow ranking the sample. The benefit of rank correlation coefficient also lies in the fact that it allows to quickly assess the relationship between attributes regardless of the distribution law. Examples are given and step-by-step application of each coefficient is described. When analyzing scientific research and evaluating the results obtained, the strength of association is most commonly assessed by the correlation coefficient. In this regard, a number of scales are given (Chaddock scale, Cohen scale, Rosenthal scale, Hinkle scale, Evans scale) grading the strength of association for correlation coefficient, both widely recognized and not so well known.

Conducting correlation analysis: important limitations and pitfalls

Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation

Corruption of the Pearson correlation coefficient by measurement error and its estimation, bias, and correction under different error models

Should Pearson's correlation coefficient be avoided?

Nonparametric statistics. Part 3. Correlation coefficients

How Accurate Is Your Correlation? Different Methods Derive Different Results and Different Interpretations

Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology

Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A cautionary tale on treating measurement error.

Correlating and predicting psychiatric symptom ratings: Spearman's r versus Kendall's tau correlation

Usefulness of Correlation Analysis

Challenges in Variable Importance Ranking Under Correlation

Comparison of correlation-based measures of concordance in terms of asymptotic variance

Assessing time series correlation significance: A parametric approach with application to physiological signals

Familial confounding or measurement error? How to interpret findings from sibling and co-twin control studies

Review of sample size determination methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in the one-way analysis of variance model

Are alternative variables in a set differently associated with a target variable? Statistical tests and practical advice for dealing with dependent correlations

Use and abuse of correlation analyses in microbial ecology

On Correlation and Prediction Interval Reduction

Pearson's correlation under the scope: Assessment of the efficiency of Pearson's correlation to select predictor variables for linear models