O06 Abatacept efficacy in severe refractory morphoea: experience from a specialized centre

Sophia Watts,Emma Gardette,Catherine Orteu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.006
IF: 11.113
2024-06-28
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of abatacept in the treatment of severe refractory morphoea. We conducted a single-centre prospective cohort study at a national specialized scleroderma centre treating adult patients with morphoea. The patients included had severe disabling generalized plaque, pansclerotic or linear morphoea. Abatacept was started after failure of at least two standard systemic immune-modifying therapies (SIMTs), including intravenous and/or oral corticosteroids and methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), ciclosporin and hydroxychloroquine. Patients on abatacept were assessed at baseline and 6 and 12 months, employing validated scores: the Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (particularly the modified Localized Scleroderma Skin Severity Index, mLoSSI) to assess disease activity, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to assess disease impact. In total 30 patients, all female, with a median age of 57 years (range 22–84) are currently receiving abatacept: 18 patients for ≥ 6 months and 16 for ≥ 12 months. Of these, 57% have pansclerotic morphoea. Patients had not responded to oral and/or intravenous corticosteroids in all cases, and an average of 2.4 other SIMTs, most frequently MTX (93%) and MMF (70%). At abatacept initiation, 47% of patients continued on oral prednisolone, and 13% received intravenous pulsed prednisolone. Most patients (29 of 30) continued a maintenance SIMT, 23% of patients received concomitant MMF, 37% received MTX and 20% received both MTX and MMF. At 6 months, 15 of 18 patients had available data and the median improvement in mLoSSI was 37.7%; at 12 months, all patients had available data and the median improvement was 49.1%. The mean DLQI was 17.4 at baseline, 15.1 at 6 months and 12.4 at 12 months. The mean HADS anxiety score was 10.1 at baseline, 9.3 at 6 months and 8.2 at 12 months; the mean depression score was 9.6 at baseline, 9.3 at 6 months and 10 at 12 months. Three patients (10%) discontinued abatacept: two due to early side-effects in the first 3 months and one due to plateauing of response in very severe disease. There were no serious adverse events. Abatacept appears to be an effective and safe option for severe refractory morphoea. The high DLQI and HADS scores reflect the significant psychosocial impact of the disease and tend to remain high despite significant clinical improvement. A 2-year follow-up is now needed as the disease is slow to reverse and continuing improvement was observed at 1 year.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?