Development and validation of the post-CAR prognostic index for large B-cell lymphoma patients after CAR-T progression in third or later line treatment

Gloria Iacoboni,Víctor Navarro,Pierre Sesques,Kai Rejeski,Mariana Bastos-Oreiro,Fabio Serpenti,Ana Africa Martin Lopez,Josu Iraola-Truchuelo,Javier Delgado,Ariadna Perez,Manuel Guerreiro,Ana Carolina Caballero,Nuria Martinez-Cibrian,Hugo Luzardo Henriquez,Jose Maria Sanchez Pina,Juan-Manuel Sancho,Hervé Ghesquieres,Alberto Mussetti,Lucia Lopez Corral,Rafael Hernani,Juan Luis Reguera,Anna Sureda,Francesc Bosch,Alejandro Martin Garcia-Sancho,Mi Kwon,Marion Subklewe,Andrea Kuhnl,Emmanuel Bachy,Pere Barba,Guillermo Villacampa,Pau Abrisqueta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-024-01608-8
IF: 28.5
2024-10-31
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
Abstract:Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fails to achieve durable responses in over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients in the third or later line setting. After CAR-T failure, survival outcomes are heterogeneous and a prognostic model in this patient population is lacking. A training cohort of 216 patients with progressive disease (PD) after CAR-T from 12 Spanish centers was used to develop the Post-CAR Prognostic Index (PC-PI); primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from CAR-T progression. Validation was performed in an external cohort from three different European centers ( n = 204). The prognostic score incorporated five variables, assessed at time of PD to CAR-T: ECOG (> 0), hemoglobin ( 1) and time from CAR-T to PD (< 4 months). Patients were classified in four risk groups with distinct OS (p-value < 0.05 in all comparisons). In the validation cohort, median OS in the low (31%), intermediate-low (26%), intermediate-high (17%) and high risk (26%) were 15.7, 7.1, 1.8 and 1.0 months, respectively ( p < 0.05 in all comparisons). Results were consistent following adjustment for subsequent treatment. In the external cohort, the PC-PI showed a C-statistic of 0.79 (95%CI 0.76–0.82), outperforming IPI and R-IPI. In conclusion, the PC-PI score is a novel tool for OS prediction and could facilitate risk-adapted management of LBCL patients relapsing after CAR T-cells. Additionally, these results will help stratification and interpretation of trials and real-world data incorporating CART-exposed patients.
oncology,hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?