Abstract:<h3 class="Heading">Background</h3><p class="Para">Economic evaluation can inform whether strategies designed to improve the quality of health care delivery and the uptake of evidence-based practices represent a cost-effective use of limited resources. We report a systematic review and critical appraisal of the application of health economic methods in improvement/implementation research.</p><h3 class="Heading">Method</h3><p class="Para">A systematic literature search identified 1668 papers across the Agris, Embase, Global Health, HMIC, PsycINFO, Social Policy and Practice, MEDLINE and EconLit databases between 2004 and 2016. s were screened in Rayyan database, and key data extracted into Microsoft Excel. Evidence was critically appraised using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) framework.</p><h3 class="Heading">Results</h3><p class="Para">Thirty studies were included—all health economic studies that included implementation or improvement as a part of the evaluation. Studies were conducted mostly in Europe (62%) or North America (23%) and were largely hospital-based (70%). The field was split between improvement (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">N</em> = 16) and implementation (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">N</em> = 14) studies. The most common intervention evaluated (43%) was staffing reconfiguration, specifically changing from physician-led to nurse-led care delivery. Most studies (<em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">N</em> = 19) were ex-post economic evaluations carried out empirically—of those, 17 were cost effectiveness analyses. We found four cost utility analyses that used economic modelling rather than empirical methods. Two cost-consequence analyses were also found. Specific implementation costs considered included costs associated with staff training in new care delivery pathways, the impacts of new processes on patient and carer costs and the costs of developing new care processes/pathways. Over half (55%) of the included studies were rated 'good' on QHES. Study quality was boosted through inclusion of appropriate comparators and reporting of incremental analysis (where relevant); and diminished through use of post-hoc subgroup analysis, limited reporting of the handling of uncertainty and justification for choice of discount rates.</p><h3 class="Heading">Conclusions</h3><p class="Para">The quantity of published economic evaluations applied to the field of improvement and implementation research remains modest; however, quality is overall good. Implementation and improvement scientists should work closely with health economists to consider costs associated with improvement interventions and their associated implementation strategies. We offer a set of concrete recommendations to facilitate this endeavour.</p>

Economic evaluations in medical technological innovations a mapping review of methodologies

What methods are currently available for incorporating implementation considerations within the economic evaluation of health technologies? A scoping review

A review of heath economic evaluation practice in the Netherlands: are we moving forward?

Economic Evaluation as a Tool in Emerging Technology Assessment

A Scoping Review of Different Methods of Assessing the Impact of New Medical Technologies at Early Stages of Development

Methods for Economic Evaluation of Marketed Medicines Ⅱ: Conducting Primary Economic Evaluation

Emerging Use of Early Health Technology Assessment in Medical Product Development: A Scoping Review of the Literature

An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: Key Features, Uses, and Limitations

MEDICAL DEVICE PRICES IN ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS

National Healthcare Economic Evaluation Guidelines: A Cross-Country Comparison

Approaches to Evaluating Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review

The Knowledge and Application of Economics in Healthcare in a High-Income Country Today: The Case of Belgium

Economic evaluations of medical devices in paediatrics: a systematic review and a quality appraisal of the literature

A Review of Current Approaches to Evaluating and Reimbursing New Medicines in a Subset of OECD Countries

An Introduction to Methods for Economic Evaluation of Marketed Medicines I: Setting Up an Economic Framework and Reviewing Existing Evidence

The Methodological Quality and Challenges in Conducting Economic Evaluations of Newborn Screening: A Scoping Review

Use of health economic evaluation in the implementation and improvement science fields—a systematic literature review

Challenges and Stimulating Factors for the Incorporation of Economic Considerations in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Scoping Review

Evaluating the Value for Money of Precision Medicine from Early Cycle to Market Access: a comprehensive review of approaches and challenges

Health Economic Methods: Cost-Minimization, Cost-Effectiveness, Cost-Utility, and Cost-Benefit Evaluations

Advances in Addressing Patient Heterogeneity in Economic Evaluation: A Review of the Methods Literature