Emotional Dynamics in the Age of Misinformation
Fabiana Zollo,Petra Kralj Novak,Michela Del Vicario,Alessandro Bessi,Igor Mozetic,Antonio Scala,Guido Caldarelli,Walter Quattrociocchi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138740
2015-05-29
Abstract:According to the World Economic Forum, the diffusion of unsubstantiated rumors on online social media is one of the main threats for our society.
The disintermediated paradigm of content production and consumption on online social media might foster the formation of homophile communities (echo-chambers) around specific worldviews. Such a scenario has been shown to be a vivid environment for the diffusion of false claims, in particular with respect to conspiracy theories. Not rarely, viral phenomena trigger naive (and funny) social responses -- e.g., the recent case of Jade Helm 15 where a simple military exercise turned out to be perceived as the beginning of the civil war in the US. In this work, we address the emotional dynamics of collective debates around distinct kind of news -- i.e., science and conspiracy news -- and inside and across their respective polarized communities (science and conspiracy news).
Our findings show that comments on conspiracy posts tend to be more negative than on science posts. However, the more the engagement of users, the more they tend to negative commenting (both on science and conspiracy). Finally, zooming in at the interaction among polarized communities, we find a general negative pattern. As the number of comments increases -- i.e., the discussion becomes longer -- the sentiment of the post is more and more negative.
Social and Information Networks,Computers and Society,Physics and Society