The association of language style matching in text messages with mood and anxiety symptoms
Caitlin A Stamatis,Jonah Meyerhoff,Tingting Liu,Zhaoyi Hou,Garrick Sherman,Brenda L Curtis,Lyle H Ungar,David C Mohr
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.094
Abstract:Context: Impairment in social functioning is a feature and consequence of depression and anxiety disorders. For example, in depression, anhedonia and negative feelings about the self may impact relationships; in anxiety, fear of negative evaluation may interfere with getting close to others. It is unknown whether social impairment associated with depression and anxiety symptoms is reflected in day-to-day language exchanges with others, such as through reduced language style matching (LSM). Methods: Over 16 weeks, we collected text message data from 458 adults and evaluated differences in LSM between people with average scores above/below the clinical cutoff for depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety in text message conversations. Text message sentiment scores were computed across 73 Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) categories for each participant. T-tests were used to compare LSM across two groups (average scores above/below clinical cutoff) for each of the 3 diagnostic categories (depression, generalized anxiety, social anxiety), and each of the 73 LIWC categories, with correction for multiple comparisons. Results: We found reduced LSM of function words (namely, prepositions [t=-2.82, p=.032], articles [t=-5.26, p<.001], and auxiliary verbs [t=-2.64, p=.046]) in people with average scores above the clinical cutoff for generalized anxiety, and reduced LSM of prepositions (t=-4.26, p<.001) and articles (t=-3.39, p=.010) in people with average scores above the clinical cutoff for social anxiety. There were no significant differences in LSM of function words between people with average scores above and below the clinical cutoff for depression. Across all symptom categories, elevated affective psychopathology was associated with being more likely to style match on formality, including netspeak (generalized anxiety, t=5.77, p<.001; social anxiety, t=4.14, p<.001; depression, t=3.13, p=.021) and informal language (generalized anxiety, t=6.65, p<.001; social anxiety, t=5.14, p>.001; depression, t=3.20, p=.020).We also observed content-specific LSM differences across the three groups. Conclusions: Reduced LSM of function words among patients reporting elevated anxiety symptoms suggests that anxiety-related psychosocial difficulties may be perceptible in subtle cues from day-to-day language. Conversely, the absence of differences in the LSM of function words among people with average scores above and below the clinical cutoff for depression indicates a potentially distinct mechanism of social impairment. Implications: Results point to potential markers of psychosocial difficulties in daily conversations, particularly among those experiencing heightened anxiety symptoms. Future studies may consider the degree to which LSM is associated with self-reported psychosocial impairment, with the promise of informing cognitive-behavioral mechanisms and tailoring digital interventions for social skills.