Electronic-Waste-Driven Pollution of Liquid Crystal Monomers: Environmental Occurrence and Human Exposure in Recycling Industrial Parks

Zhipeng Cheng,Qingyang Shi,Yu Wang,Leicheng Zhao,Xiaoxiao Li,Zhaoyang Sun,Yuan Lu,Na Liu,Guanyong Su,Lei Wang,Hongwen Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04621

2022-02-02

Abstract:Liquid crystal monomers (LCMs) in liquid crystal displays (LCDs) may be released into the environment, especially in electronic waste (e-waste) recycling industrial parks with a high pollution risk. However, little has been known about the environmental release and human exposure to LCMs until now. Herein, a total of 45 LCMs were detected in LCDs of commonly used smartphones and computers by high-resolution mass spectrometry with suspect screening analysis. Fluorinated biphenyls and their analogs were the dominant LCMs. Based on available standards of the screening results and previous studies, 55 LCMs were quantified in samples from an e-waste recycling industrial park in Central China. The LCMs were frequently detected in outdoor dust (n = 43), workshop #1 indoor dust (n = 53), and hand (n = 43) and forehead wipes (n = 43), with median concentrations of 6950 ng/g, 67,400 ng/g, 46,100 ng/m2, and 62,100 ng/m2, respectively. The median estimated daily intake values of the LCMs via dust ingestion and dermal absorption were 48.3 and 16.5 ng/kg body weight/day, respectively, indicating a high occupational exposure risk of these compounds. In addition, 16 LCMs were detected in the serum of eight elderly people (≥60 years old) with over 5 years of experience in e-waste dismantling operations, resulting in a total concentration range of 3.9–26.3 ng/mL.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c04621.(Text S1) Details regarding instrumental analysis of LCMs in dust and wipe samples; (Text S2) collection of human serum samples and the sample preparation; (Tables S1–S4) detailed information regarding the 55 target LCMs, about the dust and wipe samples, and about the quantification of LCMs by GC–MS and APGC-TQS-MS/MS; (Table S5) parameters used in estimating the exposure doses of LCMs; (Table S6) information about the 45 suspected LCMs; (Table S7) peak areas for the LCMs; (Tables S8–S11) concentrations of the LCMs in dust samples from workshop #1, in dust samples from workshop #2–4, in the outdoor dust samples, and in the indoor dust samples from a reference site; (Table S12) estimated properties of the LCMs; (Table S13) concentrations of other typically monitored environmental contaminants; (Tables S14–S16) concentrations of the LCMs in workers' hand skin wipes, in workers' forehead skin wipes, and in residents' wipes; (Tables S17 and S18) estimated daily intake of LCMs via dust ingestion and dermal exposure; (Figure S1) extraction of LCMs in smartphones and PCs; (Figures S2 and S3) chromatograms of LCMs and ISs; (Figure S4) structures of 45 detected LCMs; (Figure S5) Venn diagrams of LCMs in five brands of smartphones and PCs; (Figures S6–S8) distribution of individual LCMs in dust and wipe samples and distribution (%) of EDIIngestion and EDIDermal (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental