Abstract:In explanations, explainers have mental representations of explainees' developing knowledge and shifting interests regarding the explanandum. These mental representations are dynamic in nature and develop over time, thereby enabling explainers to react to explainees' needs by adapting and customizing the explanation. XAI should be able to react to explainees' needs in a similar manner. Therefore, a component that incorporates aspects of explainers' mental representations of explainees is required. In this study, we took first steps by investigating explainers' mental representations in everyday explanations of technological artifacts. According to the dual nature theory, technological artifacts require explanations with two distinct perspectives, namely observable and measurable features addressing "Architecture" or interpretable aspects addressing "Relevance". We conducted extended semi structured pre-, post- and video recall-interviews with explainers (N=9) in the context of an explanation. The transcribed interviews were analyzed utilizing qualitative content analysis. The explainers' answers regarding the explainees' knowledge and interests with regard to the technological artifact emphasized the vagueness of early assumptions of explainers toward strong beliefs in the course of explanations. The assumed knowledge of explainees in the beginning is centered around Architecture and develops toward knowledge with regard to both Architecture and Relevance. In contrast, explainers assumed higher interests in Relevance in the beginning to interests regarding both Architecture and Relevance in the further course of explanations. Further, explainers often finished the explanation despite their perception that explainees still had gaps in knowledge. These findings are transferred into practical implications relevant for user models for adaptive explainable systems.

Reframing explanation as an interactive medium: The EQUAS (Explainable QUestion Answering System) project

Reframing Explanation as an Interactive Medium: The EQUAS (Explainable QUestion Answering System) Project

A Study on Multimodal and Interactive Explanations for Visual Question Answering

From Philosophy to Interfaces: an Explanatory Method and a Tool Inspired by Achinstein's Theory of Explanation

Explanation as a process: user-centric construction of multi-level and multi-modal explanations

ASQ-IT: Interactive Explanations for Reinforcement-Learning Agents

Can You Explain That? Lucid Explanations Help Human-AI Collaborative Image Retrieval

Rethinking Explainability as a Dialogue: A Practitioner's Perspective

Adding Why to What? Analyses of an Everyday Explanation

Reason to explain: Interactive contrastive explanations (REASONX)

Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning

Explaining Explaining

From Pixels to Words: Leveraging Explainability in Face Recognition through Interactive Natural Language Processing

Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI

Confident Teacher, Confident Student? A Novel User Study Design for Investigating the Didactic Potential of Explanations and their Impact on Uncertainty

An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanation

Explainers' Mental Representations of Explainees' Needs in Everyday Explanations

Analysing Explanation-Related Interactions in Collaborative Perception-Cognition-Communication-Action

Helpful, Misleading or Confusing: How Humans Perceive Fundamental Building Blocks of Artificial Intelligence Explanations

How Level of Explanation Detail Affects Human Performance in Interpretable Intelligent Systems: A Study on Explainable Fact Checking

Towards an Explanation Space to Align Humans and Explainable-AI Teamwork