Abstract:This report focuses on reviewing the types of carbon intensity metrics, and the use of such metrics across the oil and gas sector, to monitor progress towards transitioning away from fossil fuel production. Producers are under pressure to respond to challenging conditions resulting from increasing climate policy, tightening markets and a move away by investors. A number of commentators are suggesting that production may have peaked, given these emerging trends, and the post Covid-19 pandemic. From a combination of review and modeling, this report provides some key insights on carbon intensity metrics and the impact of different carbon intensities on future production, which are pertinent to the future strategies of the oil and gas sector – Narrow-scoped metrics that only include upstream emissions are insufficient for producers reporting on progress towards climate goals. The carbon intensity of the final product also needs to be considered, given that it is increasingly subject to increased demand-side policy e.g. in relation to carbon pricing, bans on the sale of internal combustion engines (ICEs) etc. Given that climate targets are expressed in absolute terms, the relative measure of progress provided by carbon intensity metrics is insufficient to guide progress towards net-zero emissions. As shown by the modelling, there is a significant decline in the levels of production permitted under climate targets by 2050. Given the need for diversification, metrics that account for scope 3 emissions will be important, to help monitor the transformation away from oil and gas. As discussed in this report, a number of IOCs appear to be making small steps in this direction, although their key business focus very much remains on oil & gas. As the IEA (2020a) has reported, less than 1% of capital expenditure is being spent outside of core business areas. However, cleaner operations are also important. Therefore, scope 1&2 metrics are still useful for minimising upstream emissions. The modelling highlights the impact for example of high carbon intensity gas resources (due to methane emissions) on their production levels. Unconventional resources, which tend to require more energy input per unit of extraction, and are more costly, appear unlikely to be exploited in our Paris-aligned case. Any assertion that higher carbon intensity production upstream can be offset by lower emissions downstream (e.g. via higher vehicle efficiency standards) is not supported by the modelling. This is particularly the case where these oil products areexported abroad to regions with low efficiency forms of transportation/limited environmental regulation. National oil companies (NOCs) have more potential to achieve emission reduction from operational emissions, although the incentives to do so might be lower (with far less scrutiny and reporting). Diversification is also likely to be more of a challenge for NOCs, due to the reliance of public budgets on revenues gained. However, a number of high-producing countries are vigorously exploring diversification strategies. Such strategies could include massively increasing support for renewable industries, and focusing on areas such as hydrogen production and CCS applications. For the large NOC producers, with the lowest-cost conventional reserves, it is likely that they may be able to continue producing for the longest time, as climate policy stringency increases. However, given that NOCs hold the largest reserves, risks of stranding will be greater in absolute terms.

Carbon footprint of offshore platform in Indonesia using life cycle approach

Impacts Assessment of Crude Oil Exploration Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

Carbon footprint calculation in one of the largest Gas Refinery Companies in the Middle East

Carbon Footprint in Indonesia Plantation Sector: GHG Calculation for Main Commodities

A Carbon Footprint Evaluation Method for Offshore Floating Wind Installations

Financial Feasibility Study of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Project in West Java, Indonesia

KAJIAN DAMPAK LINGKUNGAN PADA CENTRAL PROCESSING PLATFORM PT. X DENGAN LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA)

2030 Palm Oil Plantation Carbon Footprint Estimation using O-LCA and Forecasting

Potential Environmental Impact of Biodiesel Production from Palm Oil using LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) in Indonesia

Sustainable supply chains – Managing environmental impact data on product platforms

Life cycle assessment of oil palm plantation in Riau province: evaluating environmental impacts

Mitigation Of Carbon Dioxide And Green House Gas Emission From Oil And Gas Industry In Indonesia

Life cycle assessment on improvement strategies of environmental sustainability for a liquified natural gas plant in Indonesia

Study of life cycle assessment in biodiesel production from crude palm oil and its benefits for the sustainability of oil palm industry in Aceh province Indonesia

Global Warming Potential from the Life Cycle of Fischer-Tropsch Fuel from Carbon Capture for Passenger Cars in Jakarta

External Cost Internalization Model of Waste Gas on Upstream Oil and Gas Fields ( A Case study of PT. Chevron Pacific Indonesia – Sumatera Light North Operations)

A New Approach for East Natuna Gas Utilization

Carbon Footprint in the Agri-Food Industry in Indonesia: An Analysis of Current Trends and Future Directions

Carbon Intensity During Oil and Gas Production Process

Life cycle assessment of floating offshore wind farms: An evaluation of operation and maintenance

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Palm Oil Plantation and Mill with Impact Categories Global Warming Potential, Acidification, and Eutrophication