Abstract 4723: Target engagement sheds light on difference in drug efficacy in breast cancer cell lines
Tomas Friman,Tuomas Tolvanen,Merve Kacal,Victoria Brehmer,Stina Lundgren,Laurence Arnold,Daniel Martinez Molina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-4723
IF: 11.2
2024-03-24
Cancer Research
Abstract:Breast cancer is a serious disease that affects millions of women worldwide, and 700,000 people succumb to the disease annually. Breast cancers are divided into several functional subgroups based on molecular characteristics and growth pattern: Luminal A and B, HER2 positive (HER2+) and triple negative. The subgroups are important from a clinical perspective as they partially guide treatment strategies. In this study we wanted to investigate the difference in target engagement with four drugs indicated for treatment of different types of breast cancer: Alpelisib, Neratinib, Vinorelbine, and Docetaxel. Five different human breast cancer cell lines were included, representing Luminal A (MCF-7, T-47D), HER2+ (SK-BR-3, BT-474), and triple negative (BT-20). We used CETSA® (CEllular Thermal Shift Assay) coupled to mass spectrometry detection to assess proteome wide changes in protein thermal stability in intact breast cancer cell lines. CETSA is unique as a target engagement detection modality as it allows for target engagement assessment in intact cells with unaltered drug molecules. Also, as biology is intact in live cells it is possible to follow compound induced downstream signaling or phenotypic events that result in changed thermal stability of proteins. In addition to assessing protein thermal stability with CETSA, which is a short treatment of 1 h, we also subjected cells in culture to prolonged drug exposures, ≤72 h, in order to measure viability. This was done to correlate early changes in protein thermal stability to the viability phenotype that manifested later. In general, responses both in protein thermal stability and cell viability was heterogenous among the cell lines. The most homogenous response in viability was observed for the Phosphatidyl Inositol 3' kinase inhibitor Alpelisib, which reduced viability to 20 - 40% in all cell lines. In contrast, partial resistance was shown to the other drugs by at least one of the cell lines. For Alpelisib, the amount and type of proteins that were thermally shifted correlated with the effect on viability. The covalent HER2 inhibitor Neratinib was most effective in inhibiting viability in HER2+ cells and proteins of the HER2 pathway were thermally shifted in these cells, which was not observed for the other cell lines. Viability of the other cell lines were also affected by Neratinib, but only at higher concentrations. Both microtubule inhibitors induced thermal stabilization of tubulins, but that did not always translate into efficacy in the viability assay. However, sensitive cell lines showed thermal shifts of tubulins at lower concentrations of compound. In oncology drug development it is important that effects on viability are driven by on-target efficacy and not by off-target effects. Here we show the benefit of connecting knowledge of target engagement and phenotypic readouts; what targets are engaged, at which concentrations, and what is the corresponding phenotype. Citation Format: Tomas Friman, Tuomas Tolvanen, Merve Kacal, Victoria Brehmer, Stina Lundgren, Laurence Arnold, Daniel Martinez Molina. Target engagement sheds light on difference in drug efficacy in breast cancer cell lines [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular s); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl) nr 4723.
oncology