Tension Side Fixation for Lapidus Arthrodesis. A Retrospective Analysis.

Ryan B. Rigby,James R. McWilliam,Braden T. Jenkins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2024.01.008
IF: 1.345
2024-01-24
The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Abstract:Moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity often requires a Lapidus procedure (1 st -tarsometatarsal arthrodesis). Traditional methods include a dorsal approach with dorsal or medial fixation. However, studies demonstrate plantar / tension-side fixation, provides superior load to failure and fixation strength. This could improve outcomes, address comorbidities, and accelerate postoperative protocols; however, a paucity exists for patient outcomes in the literature regarding tension-side-fixation. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes for tension-side Lapidus fixation. A retrospective analysis was performed of 81 patients who underwent tension-side-fixation Lapidus. Data collection consisted of: time to weight-bear, time to return to regular shoegear, hardware removal rate, revision rate, recurrence rate, relative metatarsal shortening, and nonunion rates. Mean patient age was 44 years old (range: 16-82). There were 65 females, and 16 males. The average time to weight-bearing was 10.4 days. Time to return to regular shoegear was a mean of 6 weeks (ranging 2-10 weeks). Hardware removal rate was 1.2%. The recurrence rate was 8.6% (7 of 81 patients) and 5 of those 7 patients experienced recurrence before frontal-plane-correction was adopted by the surgeon. The revision rate was 0% and despite 8.6% recurrence, no patients were dissatisfied or requested a revisional procedure. The first-metatarsal shortening was a mean of 0.42 mm. The complications were as follows: 7% superficial dehiscence, 1.2% superficial wound infection, 0% deep infection, and 1.2% asymptomatic nonunion. This study suggests tension-side-fixation for Lapidus arthrodesis may allow for safe early return to weight-bearing, early return to regular shoegear, low hardware removal rate, low revision rate, low metatarsal shortening, and low nonunion rate. Level of Evidence Level IV - Retrospective Review
surgery,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?