Long-term survival outcomes of robotic total gastrectomy for locally advanced proximal gastric cancer: a prospective study

Qing Zhong,Yi-Hui Tang,Zhi-Yu Liu,Zhi-Quan Zhang,Qi-Chen He,Ping Li,Jian-Wei Xie,Jia-Bin Wang,Jian-Xian Lin,Jun Lu,Qi-Yue Chen,Chao-Hui Zheng,Chang-Ming Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000001325

2024-03-28

International Journal of Surgery

Abstract:Background: Robotic gastrectomy is a safe and feasible approach for gastric cancer (GC); however, its long-term oncological efficacy remains unclear. We evaluated the long-term survival outcomes and recurrence patterns of patients with locally advanced proximal GC who underwent robotic total gastrectomy (RTG). Methods: This prospective study (FUGES-014 study) enrolled 48 patients with locally advanced proximal GC who underwent RTG between March 2018 and February 2020 at a tertiary referral teaching hospital. Patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in the FUGES-002 study were enrolled in a 2:1 ratio to compare the survival outcomes between RTG and LTG. The primary endpoint of the FUGES-014 study was postoperative 30-day morbidity and has been previously reported. Here we reported the results of 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), 3-year overall survival (OS), and recurrence patterns. Results: After propensity score matching, 48 patients in the RTG and 96 patients in the LTG groups were included. The 3-year DFS rates were 77.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 66.1–89.9%) for the RTG and 68.8% (95% CI 60.1–78.7%) for the LTG groups ( P =0.261). The 3-year OS rates were not significantly different between the groups (85.4% vs. 74.0%, P =0.122). Recurrence occurred in nine patients (18.8%) in the RTG and 27 (28.1%) patients in the LTG groups ( P =0.234). Recurrence patterns and causes of death were similar between the groups ( P >0.05). Conclusions: The oncological outcome of RTG was non-inferior to that of LTG. Thus, RTG might be an alternative surgical treatment for locally advanced proximal GC.

surgery