Potential therapeutic effect of a ketogenic diet for the treatment of lymphoedema: Results of an exploratory study

Inge Lodewijckx,Christophe Matthys,Joke Verheijen,Raf Verscuren,Nele Devoogdt,Bart Van der Schueren,Karolien Goffin,Inge Fourneau,Sarah Thomis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.13330
IF: 3.3
2024-06-06
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Abstract:In patients with unilateral secondary lymphoedema, consumption of a ketogenic diet improved lymphatic function, which was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in oedema volume in some patients. Further studies are needed to substantiate our findings and confirm the potential of the ketogenic diet as a novel treatment strategy for lymphoedema. Background Lymphoedema is a chronic and progressive disease characterised by excessive accumulation of lymph in the interstitial compartment, leading to tissue swelling and fibroadipose deposition. Lymphangiogenesis is partly regulated by ketone body oxidation, and a ketogenic diet (KD) has shown therapeutic efficacy in a preclinical mouse tail lymphoedema model. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the potential therapeutic effect of a KD in patients with secondary lymphoedema. Methods Nine patients with unilateral stage 2 lymphoedema secondary to lymphadenectomy were included in this quasi‐experimental exploratory study consisting of a short run‐in phase to gradually induce ketosis, followed by a classic KD (CKD) and modified Atkins diet (MAD) phase during which patients consumed a CKD and MAD, respectively. Lymphatic function and oedema volume, the primary outcomes, were assessed at baseline and at the end of both the CKD and MAD phase. Secondary outcomes included health‐related and lymphedema‐specific quality of life (QoL). Results Seven out of nine patients completed the study protocol. Lymphatic function was improved upon consumption of both a CKD (dermal backflow score [mean ± SD]: 7.29 ± 2.98 vs. 10.86 ± 2.19 at baseline; p = 0.03) and MAD (6.71 ± 2.06; p = 0.02), whereas oedema volume did not decrease during the course of the study (excess limb volume [mean ± SD]: 20.13 ± 10.25% at end of CKD and 24.07 ± 17.77% at end of MAD vs. 20.79 ± 12.96% at baseline; p > 0.99 and p > 0.30, respectively). No changes were observed in health‐related, nor lymphoedema‐specific QoL at the end of CKD and MAD. Conclusions The consumption of a KD improved lymphatic function and was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in oedema volume in some patients (3/7 at end of CKD, 2/7 at end of MAD) with unilateral stage 2 secondary lymphoedema. These results highlight the potential of a KD to improve lymphatic function in patients with lymphoedema. However, further studies are required to substantiate our findings.
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?