A Formulation Model for Computations to Estimate the Lifecycle Cost of NiZn Batteries

Ashwani Kumar Malviya,Mehdi Zarehparast Malekzadeh,Francisco Enrique Santarremigia,Gemma Dolores Molero,Ignacio Villalba-Sanchis,Victor Yepes,Victor Yepes Piqueras
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051965
IF: 3.9
2024-02-27
Sustainability
Abstract:The increasing demand for electricity and the electrification of various sectors require more efficient and sustainable energy storage solutions. This paper focuses on the novel rechargeable nickel–zinc battery (RNZB) technology, which has the potential to replace the conventional nickel–cadmium battery (NiCd), in terms of safety, performance, environmental impact, and cost. The paper aims to provide a comprehensive and systematic analysis of RNZBs by modeling their lifecycle cost (LCC) from cradle to grave. This paper also applies this LCC model to estimate costs along the RNZB's lifecycle in both cases: per kilogram of battery mass and per kilowatt hour of energy released. This model is shown to be reliable by comparing its results with costs provided by recognized software used for LCC analysis. A comparison of LCCs for three widely used battery technologies: lead–acid, Li-ion LFP, and NMC batteries, which can be market competitors of NiZn, is also provided. The study concludes that the NiZn battery was found to be the cheapest throughout its entire lifecycle, with NiZn Formulation 1 being the cheapest option. The cost per unit of energy released was also found to be the lowest for NiZn batteries. The current research pain points are the availability of data for nickel–zinc batteries, which are in the research and development phase, while other battery types are already widely used in energy storage. This paper recommends taking into account the location factor of infrastructures, cost of machinery, storage, number of suppliers of raw materials, amount of materials transported in each shipment, and the value of materials recovered after the battery recycling process to further reduce costs throughout the battery's lifecycle. This LCC model can be also used for other energy storage technologies and serve as objective functions for optimization in further developments.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of cost estimation for Nickel-Zinc Batteries (RNZB) throughout their entire lifecycle and evaluates their lifecycle cost (LCC) through modeling analysis to assess their cost-effectiveness compared to other common battery technologies such as Lead-Acid Batteries, Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries, and NMC Batteries. Specifically, the objectives of the paper are: 1. **Establish a mathematical model**: Estimate the lifecycle cost of Nickel-Zinc Batteries by modeling their entire lifecycle from "cradle to grave." 2. **Cost comparison**: Compare the lifecycle cost of Nickel-Zinc Batteries with three widely used battery technologies (Lead-Acid Batteries, Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries, and NMC Batteries). 3. **Cost optimization recommendations**: Propose methods to further reduce the lifecycle cost of the batteries, including considering factors such as the location of infrastructure, mechanical equipment costs, storage costs, the number of raw material suppliers, the amount of material per shipment, and the value of recovered materials during battery recycling. The research results indicate that Nickel-Zinc Batteries have the lowest cost over their entire lifecycle and the lowest cost per unit of energy released. Additionally, the paper recommends specific measures to further reduce costs and points out that the LCC model can be applied to the optimization of other energy storage technologies.