Tourism Development and Rural Land Transfer-Out: Evidence from China Family Panel Studies

Pengfei Sun,Hong Cao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040426

IF: 3.905

2024-03-28

Land

Abstract:For a long time, the decline in agricultural comparative returns and the urban–rural development gap in China have prompted the outflow of rural labor. Land transfer policies, which allow farmers to retain their land contracting rights while transferring their management rights, were instituted to mitigate the impact of labor outflow on land use and agricultural production. In recent years, tourism has contributed to the diversification of the rural economy and has had an essential impact on the urban–rural allocation of elements such as labor. In this paper, we adopt a probit model to investigate the impact of tourism development on rural land transfer-out by using data from the China Family Panel Studies. The results show that the marginal effect of tourism development is significantly negative, indicating that the probability of rural land transfer-out was significantly reduced with tourism development. The results are still valid after a series of robustness tests. A mechanism analysis indicates that tourism development inhibits land transfer by enhancing local vitality, such as increasing the local employment of rural labor and promoting participation in agricultural production. Moreover, from the perspective of rural welfare and asset prices, further research finds that tourism development contributes to poverty alleviation and increases land value. These results suggest that tourism development inhibits land transfer while promoting rural sustainable development, helping to understand the impact of tourism on rural land use and household asset allocation from a more comprehensive perspective.

environmental studies

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper examines the impact of tourism development on rural land transfer. Over the years, the decline in comparative agricultural returns and the urban-rural development gap in China have led to the outflow of rural labor. The land transfer policy allows farmers to retain contracting rights while transferring operational rights to mitigate the impact of labor outflow on land use and agricultural production. In recent years, tourism has promoted the diversification of rural economies and has had a significant impact on the allocation of factors such as labor between urban and rural areas.

The study uses a probit model based on Chinese household panel data and finds that the marginal effect of tourism development on rural land transfer is significantly negative, indicating that tourism development reduces the probability of land transfer. After a series of robustness tests, this result remains valid. Mechanism analysis shows that tourism development inhibits land transfer by enhancing local vitality, such as increasing local employment of rural labor and promoting agricultural participation. Furthermore, further research from the perspectives of welfare and asset prices finds that tourism contributes to poverty reduction and increases land value. These results indicate that while tourism development suppresses land transfer, it promotes rural sustainable development and provides insights into the comprehensive impact of the tourism industry on rural land use and household asset allocation.

The paper assumes that tourism development significantly reduces the likelihood of rural land transfer, and it suppresses land transfer through two mechanisms: local rural labor employment and agricultural participation. The study uses data from the Chinese Household Panel Study, including household questionnaires and control variables, to test these assumptions. Preliminary results show that tourism development does significantly reduce the probability of land transfer, supporting the proposed hypotheses.