Malignancy and “Violated Neck” Rates in Consecutive Cohort of 79 Adult Patients With Solitary Cystic Neck Mass—Lessons Learned and Recommendations for Clinical Practice Guidelines

Jure Pupić-Bakrač,Sandeep Jayasekara,Prasangi M. Peiris,Liyanaarachchige A.H. Jayasinghe,Kanchana Kapugama,Nadeena S.S. Jayasuriya,Parakrama Wijekoon,Manjula Attygalla
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010122
2024-04-23
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Abstract:Objective: The neck region is a common site for solitary cystic neck mass (SCNM) of various etiologies, including congenital, inflammatory, and neoplastic. In adults, the primary focus is excluding malignancy. The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the accuracy of available diagnostic technologies for the differentiation of benign and malignant SCNM in adult patients. The study aimed to develop new clinical practice guidelines for evaluating and managing SCNM. Methods: The primary predictive variables were the diagnostic utilities of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), ultrasound (U/S), multislice computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The study’s endpoint was the overall diagnostic accuracy in differentiating between benign and malignant SCNM. The final diagnosis was based on histopathology. Results: The study included 79 adult patients: 55 (69.62%) male and 24 (30.38%) female ( P <0.05). The mean age at presentation was 42.1 years (range: 18–84 years). Solitary cystic neck mass was distributed in the anterior neck region in 30 (37.97%) patients and the posterolateral neck regions in 49 (62.03%) patients ( P <0.05). The posterolateral neck regions had a significantly higher rate of malignant SCNM than the anterior neck region [19/49 (38.78%) versus 1/30 (3.33%)] ( P <0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the U/S+FNAC and U/S+FNAC+multislice computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging groups in differentiating benign and malignant SCNM (40/42 versus 36/37, P >0.05). “Violated neck” was recorded in 2 cases. Conclusion: A systematic investigation protocol should be applied to evaluate adult patients with SCNM.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?