Multidirectional instability of the shoulder: a systematic review with a novel classification

Victor Housset,Sean Wei Loong Ho,Alexandre Lädermann,Sean Kean Ann Phua,Si Jian Hui,Geoffroy Nourissat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/eor-23-0029
IF: 4.775
2024-04-05
EFORT Open Reviews
Abstract:Purpose A variety of instabilities are grouped under multidirectional instability (MDI) of the shoulder. This makes understanding its diagnostic process, presentation and treatment difficult due to lack of evidence-based consensus. This review aims to propose a novel classification for subtypes of MDI. Methods A systematic search was performed on PubMed Medline and Embase. A combination of the following 'MeSH' and 'non-MesH' search terms were used: () Glenohumeral joint[tiab] OR Glenohumeral[tiab] OR Shoulder[tiab] OR Shoulder joint[tiab] OR Shoulder[MeSH] OR Shoulder joint[MeSH], () Multidirectional[tiab], () Instability[tiab] OR Joint instability[MeSH]. Sixty-eight publications which met our criteria were included. Results There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the definition of MDI. Thirty-one studies (46%) included a trauma etiology in the definition, while 23 studies (34%) did not. Twenty-five studies (37%) excluded patients with labral or bony injuries. Only 15 (22%) studies defined MDI as a global instability (instability in all directions), while 28 (41%) studies considered MDI to be instability in two directions, of which one had to include the inferior direction. Six (9%) studies included the presence of global ligamentous laxity as part of the definition. To improve scientific accuracy, the authors propose a novel AB classification which considers traumatic etiology and the presence of hyperlaxity when subdividing MDI. Conclusion MDI is defined as symptomatic instability of the shoulder joint in two or more directions. A comprehensive classification system that considers predisposing trauma and the presence of hyperlaxity can provide a more precise assessment of the various existing subtypes of MDI. Level of Evidence III
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?