The Emission of Internal Conversion Electrons Rather Than Auger Electrons Increased the Nucleus-Absorbed Dose for 161Tb Compared with 177Lu with a Higher Dose Response for [161Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 Than for [161Tb]Tb-DOTATATE

Kaat Spoormans,Lara Struelens,Koen Vermeulen,Marijke De Saint-Hubert,Michel Koole,Melissa Crabbé
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.124.267873
2024-10-02
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Abstract:Preclinical data have shown that 161 Tb-labeled peptides targeting the somatostatin receptor are therapeutically more effective for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy than are their 177 Lu-labeled counterparts. To further substantiate this enhanced therapeutic effect, we performed cellular dosimetry to quantify the absorbed dose to the cell nucleus and compared dose–response curves to evaluate differences in relative biological effectiveness in vitro. Methods: CA20948 cell survival was assessed after treatment with [ 161 Tb]Tb- and [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTATATE (agonist) and with [ 161 Tb]Tb- and [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTA-LM3 (antagonist) via a clonogenic assay. Cell binding, internalization, and dissociation assays were performed up to 7 d to acquire time-integrated activity coefficients. Separate S values for each type of particle emission (Auger/internal conversion [IC] electrons and β – particles) were computed via Monte Carlo simulations, while considering spheric cells. Once the absorbed dose to the cell nucleus was calculated, survival curves were fitted to the appropriate linear or linear-quadratic model and corresponding relative biological effectiveness was evaluated. Results: Although the radiopeptide uptake was independent of the radionuclide, [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTATATE and [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 delivered a 3.6 and 3.8 times higher dose to the nucleus, respectively, than their 177 Lu-labeled counterparts on saturated receptor binding. This increased nucleus-absorbed dose was mainly due to the additional emission of IC and not Auger electrons by 161 Tb. When activity concentrations were considered, both [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTATATE and [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 showed a lower survival fraction than did labeling with 177 Lu. When the absorbed dose to the nucleus was considered, no significant difference could be observed between the dose–response curves for [ 161 Tb]Tb- and [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 showed a linear-quadratic dose response, whereas [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTATATE showed only a linear dose response within the observed dose range, suggesting additional cell membrane damage by Auger electrons. Conclusion: The IC, rather than Auger, electrons emitted by 161 Tb resulted in a higher absorbed dose to the cell nucleus and lower clonogenic survival for [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTATATE and [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 than for the 177 Lu-labeled analogs. In contrast, [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTATATE showed no higher dose response than [ 177 Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, whereas for [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 an additional quadratic response was observed. Because of this quadratic response, potentially caused by cell membrane damage, [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTA-LM3 is a more effective radiopeptide than [ 161 Tb]Tb-DOTATATE for labeling with 161 Tb.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?